
12-14-2018, 10:55 AM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,370
Thanks: 23,000
Thanked 5,929 Times in 3,371 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88
You guys do realize the Colts could give $30M upfront guaranteed to Bell and still have, like, $100M left to spend, right?
Money ain't an issue. At all. Short or long term. They could structure that deal in a million ways.
The issue is simply culture fit and positional emphasis. Nothing about Ballard suggests the Colts would invest in Bell from those aspects. BUT Ballard has also shown that he'll take a winning player against the risk factor, so we really don't know.
Personally, if I'm going to take a $30M cap hit for 2-3 OK players or 1 playmaker, I'll take the playmaker. Especially at this point in Colts' evolution where they don't need as many bodies as years past.
|
I think Shrek needs to join the discussion to show how many players we have who need re-signed/replaced that are not on contract before we throw out the $130M number.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
|