![]() |
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But the fact that neither Smith nor Glowinski were projected starters out of Training Camp and that Clark and Haeg saw a lot of playing time earlier shows that you have to have QUALITY DEPTH to be a good O-Line. We have one current O-Line starter ending their contract each year from 2019 - 2023. 2019 = Glowinski 2020 = Castonzo 2021 = Kelly 2022 = Smith 2023 = Nelson (with 5th year option) As long as they continue to play well AND we choose to re-sign them, I totally agree with you on not needing to use TOP draft picks on the O-line and just keep up the quality depth. BUT, there is no guarantee that they will continue to play well nor that the team will re-sign them. The key is that we have had the depth to survive to this point and find five guys who can play well together 2019 = Good 2020 = Clark, Haeg Do we re-sign those depth guys? Or draft new depth? To have a quality O-Line, you have to keep adding talent to it every season. One draft pick in the top four rounds every season (25% of your draft picks in those rounds) should go to O-Line (23% of your starters), IMO. If the O-Line is suprerior, then having only average offensive speciality folks can still make an offense run. If you have an average to below average O-Line, the best set of receivers will be worthless as the QB never has time to throw and the RBs never have holes to run in. Walk Worthy
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! ![]() ![]()
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post: | ||
Oldcolt (10-24-2018), YDFL Commish (10-24-2018) | ||
|
|