![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think people took the about-face the Giants did on Manning too far. When their HC was there and benched Manning, it appeared the Giants were moving on, but obviously that guy was fired and Manning was right back to starting. But somehow that turned into "The Giants are in win-now mode and will build as much as possible around Manning to try to get another SB before he retires." I don't know of any direct quotes that support that. I'll be surprised if they don't take a QB.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I fully agree that the Giants ought to take a QB, but seen many a mock where they select Barkley and i was just playing devils advocate in terms of what the Colts might then do if Chubb, Barkley and Nelson were not on the board when they pick.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The mock draft on NFL Total Access today was projecting Nelson to the Giants, Barkley to Cleveland with their 4 pick and Chubb to colts at 6 with QBs selected in the other spots above. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
That works for me. Anything that gets Chubb to the Colts.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am pretty much in the camp of:
1. Chubb 2. Nelson 3. Trade Down Neither of the other two "talents" (Barkley, Fitzpatrick) really make sense for the Colts at #6 so if both the linemen are off the board then lets go get some more 2nd and 3rd round pick to drop down a slot or 3 and pick from the next tier of guys to help our team. Walk Worthy,
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! ![]() ![]()
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post: | ||
VeveJones007 (03-20-2018) | ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not sure I trust Gettleman to do the sensible thing, which is either draft a QB or trade out.
|
![]() |
|
|