Kyle Pitts instead of Michael Pittman?

[Hoopsdoc]

Originally Posted by Mr. Session

You know how it is, everyone always speculates and everybody has an opinion. I don't get to hear Indy media all that much so I can't say for sure how it compares. Their takes are never really that much deeper than what you'd read here.

I can tell you this. They talk about him the same way they talked about Vic Beasley. Beasley was always underproductive and didn't come close to matching his draft value until his contract year.

This is why I say no on Pitts. Up until this season, he was a borderline bust. Then he has career highs across the board in a contract year.

I’d be wary of giving this dude a massive contract. Could be an Albert Haynesworth type situation.