2019 Draft - Interior DL

[FatDT]

Don’t think any of our DTs play much 0 tech, don’t remember seeing anybody head-up on the center often at all.

[VeveJones007]

Originally Posted by FatDT

Don’t think any of our DTs play much 0 tech, don’t remember seeing anybody head-up on the center often at all.

Yeah, was my fault for bringing “nose” into the conversation. They don’t employ a true NT, but the guy in the A gap is the defacto nose when the other DT is in the B gap. They need someone who has the size/strength to hold up against the G/C double or beat that gap. That’s where I think they would primarily use Wilkins.

[FatDT]

Originally Posted by VeveJones007

Yeah, was my fault for bringing “nose” into the conversation. They don’t employ a true NT, but the guy in the A gap is the defacto nose when the other DT is in the B gap. They need someone who has the size/strength to hold up against the G/C double or beat that gap. That’s where I think they would primarily use Wilkins.

It was you saying 0-tech, which lines up between the A gaps, that I was referring to. Our nose plays mostly 1 tech, like you are saying, in the A gap.

[Chromeburn]

Originally Posted by FatDT

It was you saying 0-tech, which lines up between the A gaps, that I was referring to. Our nose plays mostly 1 tech, like you are saying, in the A gap.

I think I brought up the 0-tech stuff too. But since Woods went down and they moved Hunt to NT, an experiment that largely paid off. Wth both guys in the A gap, do they continue that, or was it a gimmick formation they just employed from the past bc Hunt is a lighter NT than they would like?

[VeveJones007]

Originally Posted by FatDT

It was you saying 0-tech, which lines up between the A gaps, that I was referring to. Our nose plays mostly 1 tech, like you are saying, in the A gap.

Not that it really matters, but I never said 0-tech. I said nose, even though I meant it as a 1 tech in this scheme.

[FatDT]

Originally Posted by VeveJones007

Not that it really matters, but I never said 0-tech. I said nose, even though I meant it as a 1 tech in this scheme.

My mistake. It was Chromeburn, not you.