![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe this will all work out, Reich has made a lot of great moves and earned a lot of credit so there's not a ton of reason to doubt him. I just still don't get moving on from a guy that coached this OL to be the best line we've had in decades. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mudd was a tough player and as a coach, he taught technic. Everybody kept their feet moving, you never saw his linemen getting their legs rolled up. He got the most out of the guys Polian found for him.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Strausser and Howard Mudd are on the job
![]() Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember reading where Nelson thought his technique was slipping near the end of the season. I wondered at the time why. Apparently Reich/Ballard thought it was coaching. Obviously (look at how the line played) Guge was not a bad coach, just that Reich/Ballard seem to know exactly what they want in a coach and Guge didn't emphasize or teach fundamentals the way they wanted. I love that they believe in themselves enough to make a change that they will get reamed for if the offensive line play deteriorates (it won't). Ballard/Reich play to win, they are not afraid of losing. Damn this is so refreshing after the last shit show we lived thru.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Age is just a number. I think much of the success the OL achieved was very good talent finally & the new scheme that makes Luck get rid of the ball quicker. DeGugliemo seemed more of rah rah guy than a teacher. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Nelson himself said the idea that Guge was not a good technique teacher was false. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mudd is probably pretty interested in the level of personnel we have now as well.
__________________
** 2017 Premier league champion ** "I want to dominate all my opponents, and take their will away to play the game, by each play, and finishing them past the whistle." |
![]() |
|
|