ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-22-2018, 09:56 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,498
Thanks: 1,466
Thanked 3,854 Times in 2,150 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DragonTails View Post
I'd like to stick with the 3 backs we have now and upgrade all other parts of the team.

You don't need elite skill position players when you have dominant lines.
Is it mutually exclusive though? I don't know if it is.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2018, 10:43 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 13,819
Thanks: 20,967
Thanked 5,416 Times in 3,068 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
Is it mutually exclusive though? I don't know if it is.
I have convinced myself that we should sign him. We have the space. It keeps him from going to another AFC team and vaulting them past us. Just front-load it.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2018, 11:07 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,350
Thanks: 2,645
Thanked 2,553 Times in 1,144 Posts
Default

I would love to see how Reich uses Bell's skillset. Both Bell and Hines can play wr Having them on the field at the same time with this offensive line could provide matchup nightmares. You would hope that the Colts at least kick the tires.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oldcolt For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (12-22-2018)
  #4  
Old 12-22-2018, 11:23 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,535
Thanks: 1,038
Thanked 2,668 Times in 1,374 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
Is it mutually exclusive though? I don't know if it is.
It is not, but it is hard to maintain. I just have a hard time wrapping my head around paying a RB as much as he wants, when they take a lot of abuse and tend to drop off hard and quick. He is an amazing talent and would be an awesome tool in this offense, but RBs tend to get banged up at a high rate and just fall off hard. I prefer to stick with the RB by committee.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Butter For This Useful Post:
JAFF (12-23-2018)
  #5  
Old 12-23-2018, 02:51 AM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,498
Thanks: 1,466
Thanked 3,854 Times in 2,150 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
It is not, but it is hard to maintain. I just have a hard time wrapping my head around paying a RB as much as he wants, when they take a lot of abuse and tend to drop off hard and quick. He is an amazing talent and would be an awesome tool in this offense, but RBs tend to get banged up at a high rate and just fall off hard. I prefer to stick with the RB by committee.
I stopped thinking of him as a RB. We would still have the committee though. Heck, we could run a 2 back RPO set if we wanted. We have so much money just sitting there. I feel like I am talking myself into it. I'm just in favor of doing whatever we need to get another SB.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.