Autry

[Butter]

Originally Posted by Dam8610

1) How many of those are new players?

2) The continued use of this phrasing shows a profound and complete lack of understanding of what my argument was.

You lacked a sensible argument that is why everyone turned on you.

[Racehorse]

Originally Posted by Butter

You lacked a sensible argument that is why everyone turned on you.

True. As they say, you never go full Tom Simpson. He went full Tom Simpson.

[sherck]

Originally Posted by Racehorse

True. As they say, you never go full Tom Simpson. He went full Tom Simpson.

He just needed to have his stance adjusted.



Walk Worthy,

[Pez]

Two threads derailed by the coaching matters.... one about Autry and another about the site background.

Does anyone really enjoy talking about this?

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by Racehorse

True. As they say, you never go full Tom Simpson. He went full Tom Simpson.

Who was the dt that he said would be a pro bowler with 5 minutes of his coaching?

[Racehorse]

Originally Posted by omahacolt

Who was the dt that he said would be a pro bowler with 5 minutes of his coaching?

Was it a DT or an OLineman?

[YDFL Commish]

It was a DT. I think it was Daniel Nuir.

[Racehorse]

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish

It was a DT. I think it was Daniel Nuir.

I think I will do my C&O impression and resurrect a defunct thread with the answer.

[Racehorse]

OK, so he was never a member on the new board, it seems.

[Dam8610]

Originally Posted by Butter

You lacked a sensible argument that is why everyone turned on you.

My argument was, and stance on the issue still is, that coaching typically has a neutral or negative effect on team performance on gameday. For all the love around here for Frank Reich and the coaching staff (deservedly so, because they've done their job, player development, well), Reich has been proof positive of my argument. Going for the win against Houston the first time is costing the Colts a shot at the division right now, for example.