
04-29-2018, 04:46 PM
|
 |
Post whore
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,517
Thanks: 1,474
Thanked 3,876 Times in 2,165 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by retinamark
If Bradley Chubb was the preferred target, why trade out of pick 3, only to consider trading back up? I understand that Chubb could’ve gone as early as 2 to NYG. But if they really were that high on him, why not take a chance, stay at 3, and see how the draft plays out?
—
Jim Irsay: #Colts considered trading up for Bradley Chubb, but couldn't pass on Quenton Nelson.
"He just doesn’t have any weaknesses. It’s almost like you’re seeing a guy who was a computer simulation of what an offensive lineman should be."
https://twitter.com/zkeefer/status/9...210555394?s=21
—
Irsay says they had internal discussions about trading up (I assume to No. 4 or 5) to take Chubb, but "Nelson was too good to pass up."
https://twitter.com/holderstephen/st...094314497?s=21
—
“Indianapolis with the No. 6 pick called the Broncos about moving up one spot to take Chubb.”
http://www.9news.com/mobile/article/...r/73-546939481
|
When we traded out of three we changed the projection of the draft. It forced Cleveland to go with a QB. If we had stayed Cleveland had a chance at the best or second best QB on their board at 4.
|