#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ballard said he would consider it yesterday...
Unless you meant for Chubb. TB or CHI could conceivably give a 2nd to move up to 5. It’s the type of thing the Bears have done each of the last two years. Last edited by VeveJones007; 04-21-2018 at 10:02 AM. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
This was from today's MMQB:
Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
IND trades #6 overall BUF trades #12, #53 (2nd round), #56 (2nd round), #96 (3rd round) BUF would then have #6, #22 and #65 (3rd round) to work with while IND would now be picking: 1st round - #12 2nd round - #36, #37, #49, #53, #56 3rd round - #67, #96 + extra 2nd round pick in 2019. 8 picks in the top 100 of 2018 would be a pretty great way to super charge the "rebuild." Would you trade for that combo? Walk Worthy,
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! |
The Following User Says Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post: | ||
Puck (04-24-2018) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
I agree, at 12 and 22, you can get one of the premium players, and then someone like LVE later in the first, and that's probably more impact than would come from the extra 2nd round picks.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
On a typical roster I’d probably agree. But not on this current Colts team. Between the overall lack of talent from the Grigson years and the defensive scheme change there are just so many holes on this roster. Those 2 second round picks should be starters.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
It's a balance. A lot of 2nd round picks turn out to be mediocre players. The Colts need stars, too. I would take my chances with #22, which you can always turn around and trade down if you don't love your options there.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Robinson from the Titans says that he's interested in acquiring more picks, making #25 a trade up possibility.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|