|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-05-2019, 01:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
#2
03-05-2019, 01:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
@RapSheet
The #Giants have now informed S Landon Collins that he won’t be franchise tagged, putting a top player on the free agent market, sources say. He’s hitting the open market! If the Colts don’t get him it’ll be because Ballard didn’t want him.
|
|
#3
03-05-2019, 01:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Coltsalr For This Useful Post: | ||
Luck4Reich (03-06-2019) | ||
|
#4
03-06-2019, 08:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post: | ||
Coltsfever (09-01-2019) | ||
|
#5
03-07-2019, 12:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
03-07-2019, 08:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Like they are lining up to get to Detroit. 
|
|
#7
03-07-2019, 11:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Collins seemingly is a player that checks most/all of the boxes of a player that Ballard should be interested in, but here are a few concerns I see with signing him to the kind of deal some of you are talking about (5 yr/65M, etc)
1. Is it concerning to anyone that the Giants - the team who should know his capabilities best - thought the franchise tag number was too much for him? I didn't get the sense that this was a situation where the Giants hated him personally or were forced to allow him to leave because they couldn't afford him - they just thought it would be an overpayment. 2. Is this the best use of our resources? Several have pointed out that safety isn't the greatest need on the team. So paying big money to a player who, even if he performs well, will only incrementally improve the defense may not be the best strategy. We could get better bang for our buck by spending that $13M to improve the areas where greater improvement can be achieved - even if it isn't a high profile signing. 3. Related to point #1, the safety position has been devalued in recent years as several have pointed out. Lots of good players have gone unsigned or signed greatly reduced contracts. The signs suggest this may happen again this year, given the number of seemingly high quality safeties that will be flooding the market. So is it necessary to pay top dollar for this guy? Is he that much better than the rest of the safeties? I'm asking these questions out of honest curiosity. Usually the top free agents end up being overpaid, sometimes massively so, and as a consequence I'm perhaps biased against signing those guys. I know one of the responses is likely to be that we've got lots of cap space, which is true, so why not sign him? But I believe Ballard when he says that the cap space will start to disappear when he starts resigning the Colts own free agents, so I expect him to keep a large chunk of that cap space intact this offseason.
|
|
#8
03-07-2019, 01:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But it is pretty delusional to see the Lions as a better spot either historically or when projecting the future.
|
|
#9
03-05-2019, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
He's from Louisiana, so maybe he would prefer a team in the southeast? Maybe he'd like to be in a more attacking-oriented scheme?
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post: | ||
rcubed (03-05-2019) | ||
|
#10
03-05-2019, 02:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
