Glowinski Signed to Extension

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by sherck

Your response is old, worn and tired.

Name calling when you disagree with something is what children do. Since I am pretty sure you are over the age of 20, stop acting like a child.

Grow up and act like an adult.



Walk Worthy,

My response was accurate. Adults also don’t get pissy about nonsense on a football message board. Children do that.

JMO Pete

[Butter]

Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy

There is an article in the Seattle Times that takes a look back at how and why Seattle waived Glow and why he probably ended up with the Colts.

Of course one reason is because of a roster crunch - trying to work with the roster leading up to a game dealing with multiple injuries. But it appears Seattle was also wanting to avoid a bigger cap hit and wanted to void his rookie contract after he qualified for performance escalators.

It also states that Glow was on the Colts radar because of Ed Dodds - who had previously been in Seattle's front office.

The article is linked below:

https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/...-the-seahawks/

Nice article Dee.

[Chromeburn]

Originally Posted by Butter

Nice article Dee.

Makes me wonder how Bashem is doing. Although not even close to the same.

[Chaka]

Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy

There is an article in the Seattle Times that takes a look back at how and why Seattle waived Glow and why he probably ended up with the Colts.

Of course one reason is because of a roster crunch - trying to work with the roster leading up to a game dealing with multiple injuries. But it appears Seattle was also wanting to avoid a bigger cap hit and wanted to void his rookie contract after he qualified for performance escalators.

It also states that Glow was on the Colts radar because of Ed Dodds - who had previously been in Seattle's front office.

The article is linked below:

https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/...-the-seahawks/

Here's another article, this one announcing that Glowinski had lost his starting job in Seattle during the 2017 season, and providing some additional insight to how he was viewed at the time (spoiler: the Seattle fans didn't seem to think much of him):

https://www.fieldgulls.com/2017/9/24...tarting-lineup

[AlwaysSunnyinIndy]

Originally Posted by Chaka

Here's another article, this one announcing that Glowinski had lost his starting job in Seattle during the 2017 season, and providing some additional insight to how he was viewed at the time (spoiler: the Seattle fans didn't seem to think much of him):

https://www.fieldgulls.com/2017/9/24...tarting-lineup

I think a lot of Seattle fans have now redirected their ire from the players to Tom Cable. I saw those sentiments both on message boards and on Twitter. Since Cable is now back as the OL Coach with the Raiders and the Raiders coaching staff were coaching the North team of the Senior Bowl, I found one commenter funny:

>>Cable was on the field coaching at the Senior Bowl and I couldn't help but scream "DON'T LISTEN TO HIM!"<<

Here was one thread below which discussed Glows contract but turned into a bashing Cable thread:

http://www.seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=153469

[Racehorse]

Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy

I think a lot of Seattle fans have now redirected their ire from the players to Tom Cable. I saw those sentiments both on message boards and on Twitter. Since Cable is now back as the OL Coach with the Raiders and the Raiders coaching staff were coaching the North team of the Senior Bowl, I found one commenter funny:

>>Cable was on the field coaching at the Senior Bowl and I couldn't help but scream "DON'T LISTEN TO HIM!"<<

Here was one thread below which discussed Glows contract but turned into a bashing Cable thread:

http://www.seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=153469

Looks like he is the connection between all of their line issues.

[sherck]

I really liked Glowinski's play for us in 2018 and am glad he is back for the next three seasons at a very attractive rate.

I will love to see what our "Fav Five" can do with a full offseason and Training Camp playing alongside each other. They could do rare things together.

Also, throw in Clark, Haeg, a mid/late round rookie and perhaps Boehm as quality depth and we are cooking on oil with the O-Line.

2020 = Castonzo UDFA (age 32)
2021 = Ryan Kelly UDFA (age 28)
2022 = Braden Smith UDFA (age 26), Mark Glowinski UDFA (age 30)
2023 = Quinton Nelson UDFA assuming we used 5th year option in 2022 (age 27)

Realisticly, our line could stay intact for 2020 / 2021 / 2022 but by then, Castonzo will probably need replaced and the team may not be able to re-sign both Smith and Glowinski in the same off season.

Enjoy the ride on O-Line Colts fans; it will hopefully be great for the next couple of years.

Walk Worthy

[JAFF]

Originally Posted by omahacolt

My response was accurate. Adults also don’t get pissy about nonsense on a football message board. Children do that.

JMO Pete

So if I suggest you work really hard at being a wanker, its ok because its accurrate

[VeveJones007]

Originally Posted by sherck

I really liked Glowinski's play for us in 2018 and am glad he is back for the next three seasons at a very attractive rate.

I will love to see what our "Fav Five" can do with a full offseason and Training Camp playing alongside each other. They could do rare things together.

Also, throw in Clark, Haeg, a mid/late round rookie and perhaps Boehm as quality depth and we are cooking on oil with the O-Line.

2020 = Castonzo UDFA (age 32)
2021 = Ryan Kelly UDFA (age 28)
2022 = Braden Smith UDFA (age 26), Mark Glowinski UDFA (age 30)
2023 = Quinton Nelson UDFA assuming we used 5th year option in 2022 (age 27)

Realisticly, our line could stay intact for 2020 / 2021 / 2022 but by then, Castonzo will probably need replaced and the team may not be able to re-sign both Smith and Glowinski in the same off season.

Enjoy the ride on O-Line Colts fans; it will hopefully be great for the next couple of years.

Walk Worthy

Can't do everything in one offseason, but I'd really like to get a strong veteran backup for Kelly and draft a young, projectionable LT prospect.

[FatDT]

Originally Posted by sherck

I really liked Glowinski's play for us in 2018 and am glad he is back for the next three seasons at a very attractive rate.

I will love to see what our "Fav Five" can do with a full offseason and Training Camp playing alongside each other. They could do rare things together.

Also, throw in Clark, Haeg, a mid/late round rookie and perhaps Boehm as quality depth and we are cooking on oil with the O-Line.

2020 = Castonzo UDFA (age 32)
2021 = Ryan Kelly UDFA (age 28)
2022 = Braden Smith UDFA (age 26), Mark Glowinski UDFA (age 30)
2023 = Quinton Nelson UDFA assuming we used 5th year option in 2022 (age 27)

Realisticly, our line could stay intact for 2020 / 2021 / 2022 but by then, Castonzo will probably need replaced and the team may not be able to re-sign both Smith and Glowinski in the same off season.

Enjoy the ride on O-Line Colts fans; it will hopefully be great for the next couple of years.

Walk Worthy

Not a big deal but the acronym UDFA usually stands for "undrafted free agent", does it not? Unrestricted free agent is usually UFA.

I have a feeling we could spend a higher pick than many expect on a center or center/guard prospect. Kelly is a top center when he is able to play, but he hasn't completed a single season without missing time with injury. He's the undisputed starter, but injuries like that pile up. If the right player comes along I could see Ballard using a 3rd on the future starting center.