View Single Post
  #11  
Old 05-01-2021, 08:13 AM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,779
Thanks: 1,737
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,080 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
That only works if the Browns have the same # of picks over the next two years. The Colts have 2 picks to Philly if Wentz works out? And how he plays will will determine which round?

You are comparing two different Philosophies, picks and multiple years. You cant use Cleveland to justify what Ballard should do for Indy.. Ballard must take a long term view, not a yearly view.
I think you're looking too deep into what I was saying. I was pointing out that the Browns didn't give up much to move up 7 spots: Nos. 59 and 89 for Nos. 52 and 113. Based on that we should have had enough capitol in this years draft to move up a couple of spots to at least draft Radunz without giving up too many picks.

Also, drafting an LT to protect the QB you just traded for would be for the long term. Signing some depth guys like Tevi and hoping they start performing at a starting caliber level isn't long term either.

Last edited by IndyNorm; 05-01-2021 at 08:15 AM.
Reply With Quote