ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-16-2018, 09:48 PM
TheMugwump's Avatar
TheMugwump TheMugwump is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,334
Thanks: 1,988
Thanked 2,153 Times in 1,197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indycolts2 View Post
I'm not doubting your seeing the calls against the Colts in replay but in no way did Castonzo deserve a block in the back penalty when they called that.
This, plus the non-flag on Prescott's intentional grounding. That ball was 5 yards short of the LoS and at the feet of a lineman.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-16-2018, 09:48 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,614
Thanks: 1,691
Thanked 4,815 Times in 1,972 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt Classic View Post
He's still on his fairly cheap contract until 2022, but who wants a safety that doesn't show up on the stat sheet much? I can't imagine he'd return even a 4th.
I will take it
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-16-2018, 10:03 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,511
Thanks: 1,474
Thanked 3,867 Times in 2,160 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
I will take it
I’d rather wait and see how he does next season. If he does better and you still want to trade him, then he raised his value. If not then his value stays about the same. But his talent is worth it to me to have another year. And he does seem to be doing his job, I haven’t read any complaints about him from the coaches.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-16-2018, 10:05 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 819
Thanked 2,914 Times in 1,383 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMugwump View Post
This, plus the non-flag on Prescott's intentional grounding. That ball was 5 yards short of the LoS and at the feet of a lineman.
I was disappointed that Reich didn’t seem to throw much of a fit over that.

Also, isn’t that reviewable?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-16-2018, 10:24 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Regarding.Hooker. I was excited about him when we drafted him. I love a playmaking, ball-hawking safety. But either he isnt’ who we thought, or he is wasted in this defense. Either way, if we were able to trade him for a 3rd or better, I would be happy with that. I just don’t think it is going to work out. I’m not mad at Hooker either. I just don’t think it’s a good fit.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-16-2018, 10:52 PM
GoBigBlue88 GoBigBlue88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 132
Thanked 1,180 Times in 356 Posts
Default

Eh, I'm OK with Hooker still erasing big plays on the back end. There's presumably a reason teams aren't airing it out against the Colts. Sure, if you can get a high pick and argue a 2nd-3rd round safety could do the same thing in this system, have at it. But for now, I'm OK with riding Hooker deep.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to GoBigBlue88 For This Useful Post:
Butter (12-17-2018), Colt Classic (12-16-2018), natagu23 (12-17-2018), Oldcolt (12-17-2018), sherck (12-17-2018), VeveJones007 (12-17-2018)
  #37  
Old 12-16-2018, 10:59 PM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 5,344
Thanks: 2,661
Thanked 3,313 Times in 1,905 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daedge View Post
It's just nice to really care about this team again. I mean, I never stopped really caring, but it was soul destroying watching them in recent years. It was a case of watching them and not caring. There was next to nothing to get excited about. I even stopped yelling at the TV, or punching the air, when a call went against us. Like I said, it was soul destroying. Yet I still watched the depressing train-wreck of a Pagano coached team.

Thank goodness that era is over. Now, the chest pounding is back when Autry slams a punk like Dak into the turf.

There is reason to believe. I'm shitty again when the Colts lose, and my day is made when they win.

GO COLTS.
I definitely cared as little as possible the last two years. I even missed a few games which I pretty much never do. I'm glad I'm back to my usual routine, with me panicking that I may hear the score of the game before I get back home to it on my DVR when I have to do crappy xmas stuff during the holidays.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nate505 For This Useful Post:
southside asshole (12-16-2018)
  #38  
Old 12-16-2018, 11:01 PM
southside asshole southside asshole is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: take a guess
Posts: 121
Thanks: 165
Thanked 130 Times in 45 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 View Post
Eh, I'm OK with Hooker still erasing big plays on the back end. There's presumably a reason teams aren't airing it out against the Colts. Sure, if you can get a high pick and argue a 2nd-3rd round safety could do the same thing in this system, have at it. But for now, I'm OK with riding Hooker deep.
Is Hooker that scary in coverage, or is it just the presence of a body back there deep making intermediate passes more appealing targets?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-16-2018, 11:02 PM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 5,344
Thanks: 2,661
Thanked 3,313 Times in 1,905 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indycolts2 View Post
#4: Yes the Colts absolutely lock up Kelly in off season!
The plus side to never using anything on free agency is that Ballard should be able to lock up Kelly/Nelson/Leonard/etc. with no worries at all.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-16-2018, 11:03 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,614
Thanks: 1,691
Thanked 4,815 Times in 1,972 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 View Post
Eh, I'm OK with Hooker still erasing big plays on the back end. There's presumably a reason teams aren't airing it out against the Colts. Sure, if you can get a high pick and argue a 2nd-3rd round safety could do the same thing in this system, have at it. But for now, I'm OK with riding Hooker deep.
Watch him game in and game out. There isn’t much he is doing. Period. He isn’t constantly erasing deep throws.

And he does not want to come tackle
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.