05-25-2026, 03:10 PM
|
|
Doom -N- Gloom
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 2,790
Thanked 1,724 Times in 956 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610
The problem with Downs replacing Pittman’s production is that someone else would have to replace Downs's production.
Like I said before, I think it can be done in the aggregate, but it will be something like Pierce catching 15 more, Downs catching 20 more, Warren catching 20 more, and 35 more catches going to that other group of 4 WRs I mentioned previously. That's how the team could conceivably replace Pittman’s 80 catches without bringing another high end receiver in.
|
Or just give Pierce 80-100 more targets and call it a day
|
Threaded Mode