Kyle Pitts instead of Michael Pittman?

[albany ed]

Originally Posted by Oldcolt

So is Pittman, it may be what he does best. He knows 29 million is too much for him, I bet he renegotiates a long term extension that is favorable to the cap this year. Pittman isn't the problem. Keep him if possible.

I agree. If he agrees to a renegotiation, then keep him. If he doesn't, you're not going to find a single team willing to trade for that cap hit. So, it's either renegotiate or he gets released, which makes him a free agent. Other teams can then sign him without paying that enormous cap hit.