![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you think Pagano's second half gameplan was good?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
No, it was too conservative, especially offensively when Brissett was performing as well as he was, they should've been at least doing something with the short passing game to keep the defense off balance and not able to stack the box.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
We now have verifiable proof that Dam is capable of criticizing Pagano.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Flaccid criticism, but criticism nonetheless, I suppose.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
his whole life is a moment of weakness
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, when there is reason for it. There's just no point in restating a valid criticism, and that's already more than covered here. I've also stated in the past that I'm not a fan of the team's offensive strategy, but I wasn't much of a fan of Dungy's offensive strategy, either. I think an offense should have a TD as a goal on every drive unless the team has the lead and it's possible to run out the clock without losing the ball and without having to gain a first down. Defensive minded coaches typically don't agree with that as an offensive strategy.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I mean, really, you could just boil most of your posting down to this.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
would be nice if you ever grew a big enough dick to admit it yourself
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|