ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-17-2017, 07:50 PM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

I am much more encouraged this week than last week.

I really think the D is on the right track and last week was just an coaching embarrassment due to not wanting to start Wilson and Hooker. Once Vontae Davis is back I really think the secondary is pretty solid. Even on the play for the long TD today, the coverage was there, was a great pass and catch. Multiple plays where the secondary knocked the ball away.

The one downside was they dropped two easy INTs, both deep in AZ territory and both probably could have been return TDs.

The problem is the LBers still cannot cover underneath or over the middle worth shit. Kills them. And still not enough of a consistent pass rush

The run D has been solid two games in a row. The DL is much improved.

Brissett did better than I expected. The WRs killed him. Moncrief dropped three key passes. Sucked awful today. TY HAS to get that first down, you can stumble there.

OL is still bad. Kelly returning will help, but its still a work in progress, as it has been for 5+ years now.

The upside so far is : the division still sucks. Three teams at 1-1 Houstons office still stinks. Not sure if anyone else watched Watson against Cincy, he doesn't look that good. The one long TD run and not much in the air. The two losses are nonconference games so far, those are the least important, still only one game back in the division, its still very winnable.

This is a game where if Luck plays I think its an easy win.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DrSpaceman For This Useful Post:
apballin (09-18-2017), bertjones (09-17-2017), Racehorse (09-17-2017), sherck (09-18-2017), YDFL Commish (09-17-2017)
  #2  
Old 09-17-2017, 07:57 PM
GoBigBlue88 GoBigBlue88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 132
Thanked 1,180 Times in 356 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSpaceman View Post
OL is still bad. Kelly returning will help, but its still a work in progress, as it has been for 5+ years now.
The OL is so weird. There is no consistent good/bad trend to anyone on that unit. Most regress and most are just capable of doing terrible things at any moment. Mewhort was better this week, but scary that the next best OL was probably Vagisil.

Castonzo is ... well, the Colts need to replace Castonzo in 2018. It's just a question of whether they go pass-rusher or LT with that first round pick.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-17-2017, 08:42 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,669
Thanks: 1,712
Thanked 4,913 Times in 2,005 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 View Post
The OL is so weird. There is no consistent good/bad trend to anyone on that unit. Most regress and most are just capable of doing terrible things at any moment. Mewhort was better this week, but scary that the next best OL was probably Vagisil.

Castonzo is ... well, the Colts need to replace Castonzo in 2018. It's just a question of whether they go pass-rusher or LT with that first round pick.
I thought haeg was good today.

Castonzo will not be easy to replace.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-17-2017, 10:13 PM
bertjones's Avatar
bertjones bertjones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 92
Thanked 151 Times in 64 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
I thought haeg was good today.

Castonzo will not be easy to replace.
He wont be but I think he has to be. You can't keep treating the first half of the season as if you're on a fishing trip and keep your job.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-17-2017, 10:18 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,669
Thanks: 1,712
Thanked 4,913 Times in 2,005 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bertjones View Post
He wont be but I think he has to be. You can't keep treating the first half of the season as if you're on a fishing trip and keep your job.
I won't argue with upgrading the oline ever. I just see the league is having problems developing linemen.

I also don't think he is nearly as bad as people make him out to be
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (09-18-2017), Spike (09-17-2017)
  #6  
Old 09-17-2017, 10:29 PM
kitekrazy kitekrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 500
Thanks: 79
Thanked 84 Times in 57 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
I won't argue with upgrading the oline ever. I just see the league is having problems developing linemen.

I also don't think he is nearly as bad as people make him out to be
When they are good they also become expensive to keep. Play him a RT if someone better comes along.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-18-2017, 07:07 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,371
Thanks: 23,008
Thanked 5,933 Times in 3,373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
I won't argue with upgrading the oline ever. I just see the league is having problems developing linemen.

I also don't think he is nearly as bad as people make him out to be
They think he is bad because they forget the other side is also being paid to get past him and they forget that other coaches are better than ours are.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-17-2017, 10:19 PM
bertjones's Avatar
bertjones bertjones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,139
Thanks: 92
Thanked 151 Times in 64 Posts
Default

I know there are a lot of issues here but one thing I couldn't get out of my
mind is that we need a culture change at WR. They don't handle getting
pressed at the line of scrimmage, don't get the separation they should, have
poor recognition and rarely fight for the ball. I think it's a group that's
living off past press clippings and needs to be shaken up.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-17-2017, 10:29 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bertjones View Post
I know there are a lot of issues here but one thing I couldn't get out of my
mind is that we need a culture change at WR. They don't handle getting
pressed at the line of scrimmage, don't get the separation they should, have
poor recognition and rarely fight for the ball. I think it's a group that's
living off past press clippings and needs to be shaken up.
I think Ballard sees it that way as well, which is why he brought in Aiken and traded Dorsett. Ballard likes bigger bodies at receiver.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-17-2017, 10:31 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Hooker played well despite having a clear hitch in his step. You have to like a rookie stepping up and pushing through an injury when the rest of the secondary is beat up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.