Zach Hicks

[CletusPyle]

I would like to know what actually qualifies as a "running quarterback"? Is it someone who has the ability to run like Josh Allen and Patrick MaHomes, or does it have to be someone that uses runs as a significant part of their offense, like LaMar Jackson or Jalen Hurts?

Over the past 40 years the best QBs in the NFL were not running QBs, I'm thinking people like Montana, Young, Peyton, Brady, Marino, Favre, Aikman, Rodgers, and I am sure I am missing several others. Personally, I am not convinced that "running QBs" are the new improved NFL, a few teams of late have had success and so everyone is now convinced that if the QB doesn't have running as a main part of their offense, they are not elite or can't be the league MVP!

[Oldcolt]

I think Hick's point is not that this is what AR will be long term (the running portion). He seems to believe that AR's ability to run will get him on the field earlier because it makes the defense be 11 on 11 rather than 10 on 11. As AR progresses his legs become less important. Injuries and age always take away that portion of your game eventually (running) but when you are young it can provide another way to attack defenses. The ability to avoid the rush is huge and AR seems to have that in abundance-something he can count on for his entire career I would think. It is a lot of speculation but it will be interesting to see if Hicks has hit on something.