![]() |
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Would I have done differently, maybe. I think Stafford is older but a better QB. That would have been a higher cost. Darnold has potential and is the same age as some rookies, but bigger risk than Wentz. Rodgers and Watson have yet to play out. I read Mac Jones looks good in pats camp so far. I understand why they went with Wentz, familiarity. We will see if it works. I personally would have gone after Stafford harder. Or try one of the rookies by trading up. If neither worked I would have then gone with Wentz. Last option I would have stuck with Eason and see where the Rodgers drama goes. Last edited by Chromeburn; 06-22-2021 at 03:05 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post: | ||
Oldcolt (06-23-2021) | ||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|