ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-2021, 02:45 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 3,071
Thanked 3,039 Times in 1,384 Posts
Default

Agree about Tevi. Just want to point out that we pay our coaches to coach and teach. If he has the athletic ability and the correct attitude he could make himself some huge coin and make us all happy. Low probability it definitely not zero.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2021, 03:03 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,517
Thanks: 1,475
Thanked 3,876 Times in 2,165 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
Agree about Tevi. Just want to point out that we pay our coaches to coach and teach. If he has the athletic ability and the correct attitude he could make himself some huge coin and make us all happy. Low probability it definitely not zero.
The Chargers do the same thing. They laughed at the turnstile Tevi comments last year. After one season they dropped him and drafted a rookie this year.

LT has a huge impact. When Castonzo was out it was like a 4 win difference between when he was on the field. Why gamble on such a long shot when you have plenty of money to sign a much better rated vet. You want to develop him, I'm ok with that, do it from the bench.

Ballard goes into every season with these obvious holes. Two years ago it was WR, last year it was pass rush, this year will be LT until they sign someone. I get that he wants to develop through the draft, but it takes time to develop rookies and it seems we are constanly rebuilding some position group. And the whole reason we are here drafting DE's with our top picks is because we struck out on the previous ones.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (05-09-2021), njcoltfan (05-09-2021), rm1369 (05-09-2021), Spike (05-09-2021)
  #3  
Old 05-08-2021, 06:57 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,509
Thanks: 3,274
Thanked 3,470 Times in 1,845 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
The Chargers do the same thing. They laughed at the turnstile Tevi comments last year. After one season they dropped him and drafted a rookie this year.

LT has a huge impact. When Castonzo was out it was like a 4 win difference between when he was on the field. Why gamble on such a long shot when you have plenty of money to sign a much better rated vet. You want to develop him, I'm ok with that, do it from the bench.

Ballard goes into every season with these obvious holes. Two years ago it was WR, last year it was pass rush, this year will be LT until they sign someone. I get that he wants to develop through the draft, but it takes time to develop rookies and it seems we are constanly rebuilding some position group. And the whole reason we are here drafting DE's with our top picks is because we struck out on the previous ones.
Glass half empty or glass half full? Many teams would love to go into the post draft process with only one hole to fill.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
Oldcolt (05-08-2021), Racehorse (05-08-2021)
  #4  
Old 05-09-2021, 09:25 AM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,517
Thanks: 1,475
Thanked 3,876 Times in 2,165 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Glass half empty or glass half full? Many teams would love to go into the post draft process with only one hole to fill.
I’m sure shitty teams do. Think the Steelers, Pats, Chiefs, Saints think that way. Do we model ourselves after shit teams or the best teams in the league?

That has nothing to do with our inability to field the most complete team we can. Especially considering how much we sit under the cap every year. Maybe we would have gone further in the playoffs if we had more help at passrush. I hate to interrupt all the Ballard hero worship here, but we are not doing everything we can. And I hear mixed messages out of the team. We aren’t there yet, the locker room isn’t there yet, then I hear it’s a special team, they have a good feeling about this team. Which is it? People on here act like we have won something, as if we are sitting on top a couple Super Bowl wins. We haven’t won anything. Finally, is WR fixed? Can TY and Cambell stay healthy? If not we are Pittman and a bunch of nobodies again. Is passrush fixed? We drafted two guys, one of whom may not even play this year. We arguably got weaker at dline and oline this year.

It’s almost like Ballard doesn’t want to lose that first round pick next year and wants to make sure Wentz gets under that 75% mark.

Last edited by Chromeburn; 05-09-2021 at 09:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
Dam8610 (05-09-2021), IndyNorm (05-09-2021), smitty46953 (05-09-2021), Spike (05-09-2021), Voosh (05-09-2021)
  #5  
Old 05-09-2021, 09:48 AM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,272
Thanks: 350
Thanked 962 Times in 528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
I’m sure shitty teams do. Think the Steelers, Pats, Chiefs, Saints think that way. Do we model ourselves after shit teams or the best teams in the league?

That has nothing to do with our inability to field the most complete team we can. Especially considering how much we sit under the cap levers year. Maybe we would have gone further in the playoffs if we had more help at passrush. I hate to interrupt all the Ballard hero worship here, but we are not doing everything we can. And I hear mixed messages out of the team. We aren’t there yet, the locker room isn’t there yet, then I hear it’s a special team, they have a good feeling about this team. Which is it? People on here act like we have won something, as if we are sitting on top a couple Super Bowl wins. We haven’t won anything.

It’s almost like Ballard doesn’t want to lose that first round pick next year and wants to make sure Wentz gets under that 75% mark.
I’m afraid Ballard will always be so focused on the future and his method that the team will never have a “now” year where Ballard really pushes to field a great team. They’ll instead focus on being a good team for a much longer period. Of course it’s too early to say that for sure because they are still rebuilding and the team still isn’t where they want it to be......
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2021, 01:56 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 3,071
Thanked 3,039 Times in 1,384 Posts
Default

Team not finished product yet but is so much better than when Ballard took over. There is nothing that he has done that says he isn’t interested in winning it all. He is trying to build a complete team, defense offense and special teams (Malik Jefferson anyone?). Takes time.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oldcolt For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (05-09-2021)
  #7  
Old 05-09-2021, 02:54 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 8,329
Thanks: 9,709
Thanked 5,642 Times in 3,075 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
Team not finished product yet but is so much better than when Ballard took over. There is nothing that he has done that says he isn’t interested in winning it all. He is trying to build a complete team, defense offense and special teams (Malik Jefferson anyone?). Takes time.
How much time? The Colts need a LT, and his name is not Tevi. If I was Irsay, this shit would have already been done. Teams spend money for great players, Ballard hasn't signed anybody worth a shit. As a Colts fan, I am losing my patience with him.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-09-2021, 03:06 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,272
Thanks: 350
Thanked 962 Times in 528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
Team not finished product yet but is so much better than when Ballard took over. There is nothing that he has done that says he isn’t interested in winning it all. He is trying to build a complete team, defense offense and special teams (Malik Jefferson anyone?). Takes time.
So when do you think they will be done building and start trying to win? I’m curious because in 2018 many on here said we weren’t in a 3-4 yr rebuild. It’s 2021 now and they are still trying to draft a complete team. So do you expect them to really go after it next year? Year after?

I’m not suggesting Ballard doesn’t want to win. I think he’s doing exactly what he thinks will win. But his method reminds me of Polian’s and Ted Thompson’s. Whether or not that is good is a matter of personal preference I guess.

Last edited by rm1369; 05-09-2021 at 03:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
rcubed (05-09-2021), Spike (05-09-2021)
  #9  
Old 05-09-2021, 05:18 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,779
Thanks: 1,750
Thanked 1,925 Times in 1,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
I’m afraid Ballard will always be so focused on the future and his method that the team will never have a “now” year where Ballard really pushes to field a great team. They’ll instead focus on being a good team for a much longer period. Of course it’s too early to say that for sure because they are still rebuilding and the team still isn’t where they want it to be......
The problem isn't so much that Ballard doesn't want to go all in. The problem is that after investing in a QB in the offseason he's refusing to do any more than bottom feed off of other teams' scrap heaps for the most important position in protecting that QB. And it's not like us not having a LT is a huge surprise since AC was considering retiring after 2019.

Ballard for the most part has done a very good job, but if we don't have at least a decent LT signed by training camp then he has royally fucked this offseason up.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IndyNorm For This Useful Post:
Spike (05-09-2021)
  #10  
Old 05-09-2021, 05:32 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,780
Thanks: 3,071
Thanked 3,039 Times in 1,384 Posts
Default

I guess I agree. I look every day at least twice to see if we have signed one of the LTs. I think it is premature to crucify Ballard because it hasn’t happened yet. Ballard obviously values offensive line. These last few years have been the best line play we have had in as far back as I can remember. The Manning era could pass block with the best but we’re nowhere as physical in the run game. It’s not like Grigson is running things. I believe Ballard will put together an offensive line that I’ll be happy with
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.