![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
No. With TY out, our leading receiver this last game had 38 yards. Campbell isn't a #2 either. He's a gimmick guy. Funchess is a complete unknown. WR definitely needs to be addressed in the offseason.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think we need to give Funchess a chance throughout the remainder of the season before we decide exactly what we need to do at the receiver position.
Hilton, Funchess, Campbell and Pascal to me offer a diverse range of skills, we will also have Fountain back next year, with the likes of Johnson, Rogers, Dulin rounding out the group. I am not going to complain if we were to spend a high draft pick on a receiver, (Hilton is not getting any younger), but i am not convinced that it will be the huge priority that it has been throughout most of this year. Injuries have happened, and i am sorry but you can't legislate for losing your top 3 guys at one position. You do that and you will have no depth across the rest of your roster. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to ukcolt For This Useful Post: | ||
Racehorse (11-19-2019) | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hilton, is clearly the undisputed No. 1
Funchess, who actually knows what he will do? Campbell, has shown flashes of ability, but in his 2nd year would hopefully take a further step up and be competing with Funchess for the No. 2 role. Pascal is probably a good No. 3 guy, with the potential to develop further. Then you have the others who are all have the possibility to develop into a bigger role going forward. If Funchess doesn't show anything then yeah i think we need to add someone in the draft. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Hey, it's your world. I'm just gonna play in it for a while.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|