Kyle Pitts instead of Michael Pittman?

[Colts And Orioles]

o


Drake Wally of Sports Illustrated chimes in a what he thinks about ESPN's Bill Barnwell's Michael Pittman trade proposal.



Insane Michael Pittman Jr. Trade Take Has the Colts Getting Fleeced

(By Drake Wally)

https://www.si.com/nfl/colts/onsi/ne...e-take-fleeced



Michael Pittman Jr. has been a staple of the Indianapolis Colts offense for years, and has provided the squad with consistency, incredible leadership, and an ability to make plays when they matter most.

However, after a strong start to his 6th year with quarterback Daniel Jones, everything came crashing down when Jones went down for the year after an Achilles injury.

Now, Pittman's future with the Colts is in question, especially considering the fact that teammate Alec Pierce showed plenty of promise to be the team's next WR1. This brings rumors of a release or trade, which would save the Colts $24 Million per Over-the-Cap.

As far as a trade goes, plenty of scenarios make sense. However, in Bill Barnwell's ESPN piece highlighting trade proposals that fit, he has a baffling take ...... trading Pittman for struggling Carolina Panthers pass-catcher, Xavier Legette.

Barnwell has the Colts dealing away Pittman and a 2026 7th-rounder for Legette and a 2026 5th-rounder.

"If Indianapolis needs to spend money elsewhere, Legette would make sense slotting in as a third or fourth wide receiver behind Pierce, Josh Downs and potentially Ashton Dulin.

Ballard has loved drafting high-end athletes at receiver during his time in Indianapolis, and Legette certainly qualifies.

Having just turned 25, Legette still might have some room for growth. And if he fails to get there, it at least wouldn't cost the Colts much."

It's simple ...... this trade doesn't fit in the slightest.

Pittman is worth far more than a struggling former 1st-rounder like Legette and a 5th-round selection, especially considering that the Colts are still forfeiting a draft pick in a year where they already lack a 1st-rounder.

Legette hasn't lived up to his 1st-round tag in the slightest. Through 2 seasons and 25 starts so far, Legette has only 84 catches for 860 receiving yards to go along with 7 touchdowns.

Legette is also an underwhelming run-blocker, something that Pittman flourishes in.

While the Panthers need a receiver like Pittman in their ranks, Indianapolis would be purely foolish to execute this deal that Barnwell believes is a fit.

Even considering Pittman's struggles in the latter half of 2025, he still put up a respectable stat line. This is made even more true when laying out that he played with 3 more signal callers in Jones, Philip Rivers, and Riley Leonard.

In 17 games in 2025, Pittman snagged 80 balls for 784 receiving yards and a career-high 7 touchdown receptions. Most of this damage was done with Jones, but Rivers was 44 with nearly no arm left, and Leonard was a rookie 6th-rounder who really played just one game.

There's obviously criticism deserved for Pittman, as Pierce still showed out even with Rivers and Leonard tossing the pigskin.

But Pittman has never had QB consistency, playing with a horrific 10 field generals over 6 seasons. Yet, more often than not, he's performed well.

Arguably, the biggest draw to Pittman not being a Colts wideout in 2026 is the massive $24 Million that the team would save by cutting ties.

The Colts need to free up cap space in order to re-sign Jones and Pierce for sure, and Pittman would be the biggest impact toward making that happen ...... however, the Colts can also extend Pittman and space out his contract. While they'll still have to pay him, it will give them more freedom this year, and perhaps in future seasons.

It makes the most sense to give Pittman an extension to keep the offense as intact as it was in 2025. Shane Steichen's game-plan was destroying defenses before injuries made the wheels fall off, and Pittman was a big piece of that.

The Colts shouldn't trade away Pittman unless they're getting what he's worth. This prediction from Barnwell is simply a fleece ...... it would benefit Carolina far more than it would the Colts, and it's not even close.

Pittman's situation is one to monitor closely. However, one can disregard this deal, as it's not happening.

However, in an alternate reality, if Ballard gives away Pittman for Legette and a Day 3 pick, it would be a disgusting case of roster malpractice, and it would take away the most consistent receiver the Colts have had since 2021.

o

[albany ed]

IMO, unless Pittman agrees to a renegotiation of his current contract, any trade the Colts make is better than nothing. I see 3 scenarios

1. He renegotiates and they keep him. That's what I hope
2. He does not renegotiate and they trade him for next to nothing
3. He does not renegotiate and they release him

There is no way the Colts absorb a 29 million dollar cap hit on him and no other team will give up much if they need to absorb the lions share of that hit. Teams and Pittman know that if he does not renegotiate, the Colts will release him and he can sign with any team he wants to at a cap friendly amount.

[Hoopsdoc]

Originally Posted by albany ed

IMO, unless Pittman agrees to a renegotiation of his current contract, any trade the Colts make is better than nothing. I see 3 scenarios

1. He renegotiates and they keep him. That's what I hope
2. He does not renegotiate and they trade him for next to nothing
3. He does not renegotiate and they release him

There is no way the Colts absorb a 29 million dollar cap hit on him and no other team will give up much if they need to absorb the lions share of that hit. Teams and Pittman know that if he does not renegotiate, the Colts will release him and he can sign with any team he wants to at a cap friendly amount.

It depends on whether they plan on signing Pierce. If not and he leaves, Pittman will be back.

[albany ed]

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc

It depends on whether they plan on signing Pierce. If not and he leaves, Pittman will be back.

If they lose Pierce and keep Pittman without renegotiating that contract, I will find it difficult to be a fan.

[YDFL Commish]

Originally Posted by albany ed

If they lose Pierce and keep Pittman without renegotiating that contract, I will find it difficult to be a fan.

Yeah, if that happens, Carlie will have no choice, other than to fire Ballard that day.

[Hoopsdoc]

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish

Yeah, if that happens, Carlie will have no choice, other than to fire Ballard that day.

I’m not saying that will happen, I’m just saying it’s not out of the realm of possibility. I know they think quite a bit of Pittman.

If they decide Pierce is too expensive, then Pittman will most likely be back on his current deal, because in that scenario he’d have no reason to take less and the Colts would need him to much to force the issue.

[albany ed]

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc

I’m not saying that will happen, I’m just saying it’s not out of the realm of possibility. I know they think quite a bit of Pittman.

If they decide Pierce is too expensive, then Pittman will most likely be back on his current deal, because in that scenario he’d have no reason to take less and the Colts would need him to much to force the issue.

Is there anything that precludes the Colts from renegotiating Pittmans contract now? That's what I would do, and if he stands fast, he isn't that hot on the idea of remaining with the Colts.

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by Mr. Session

Coming from someone from Atlanta, if Pitts is the same Pitts he's been every other year, he is not going to be loved here.

Maybe him and Warren remind everyone of Gronkowski & Hernandez, but I doubt it.

agree


contract year production when he has been garbage for years. no thanks. unless he was surprisingly cheap. which I doubt

[Dam8610]

Originally Posted by omahacolt

agree


contract year production when he has been garbage for years. no thanks. unless he was surprisingly cheap. which I doubt

He had Desmond Ridder as his QB and Arthur Smith (famous for using his most talented offensive weapons as decoys) as his head coach for a good chunk of his time in Atlanta. It doesn't seem coincidental to me that by far his two best statistical seasons (rookie year and last year) were the two seasons where he had the best QB play and a playcaller who would use him as more than a decoy.

[HoosierinFL]

Trade him to the Raiders, they have crap for receivers and they are drafting Mendoza. He wont have anyone to target.

Fleece them for a 3rd rounder, their kicker, a linebacker and the safety who broke Schrader ( make that guy just take snaps all preseason and cut his ass)