![]() |
|
|
#71
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wentz's teams play better when he's not on the field. No thx.
|
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
|
This year. Wentz was an MVP candidate under Reich. That and the cheap acquisition cost make me interested in him.
|
|
#73
|
||||
|
||||
|
Cheap? Have you seen his contract?
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
|
#74
|
|||
|
|||
|
Draft pick compensation to the Eagles and guarantees will be nonexistent if he comes here. Put it this way: would you rather pay a 1 for Stafford or a 3 for Wentz? Given his history with Reich, give me Wentz for the 3. His issues are mechanical, and Frank has cleaned them up before.
|
|
#75
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post: | ||
Racehorse (01-04-2021) | ||
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eagles won't cut Wentz, that would be cap suicide. We can hope the Lions will cut Stafford, but that's not a guarantee.
|
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
|
It might be a similar situation to when Houston traded Osweiler and a second round pick to the Browns and didn't get much in return but unloaded his salary to a team that could absorb it. Same situation with Wentz but better for the Colts as Wentz has talent and Osweiler never did.
|
|
#78
|
|||
|
|||
|
It was sarcasm, catch up will you?
|
|
#79
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
15 snaps 3 QB hits 1 Sack Good showing from him. Now he needs to stay on the field. Pity he is just now really getting on it. |
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
|
According to Adam Schefter, Jets haven't decided whether to trade Darnold or the #2 pick.
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/sta...55149860540418 I strongly suspect this is just an effort to build a little leverage for the inevitable Darnold trade. From their perspective, I don't know why they'd keep a QB who is becoming much more expensive and hasn't performed up to expectations, particularly when they're going to be rebuilding anyway. Taking a QB at #2 seems to make far more sense. Ironically enough, by losing the #1 overall pick, they've increased Darnold's trade value. If they had #1 overall, they'd have an even harder time convincing any potential trade partners that they were planning on keeping him. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Chaka For This Useful Post: | ||
albany ed (01-04-2021) | ||
![]() |
|
|