Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT
Maybe. I've seen a few bad takes with regard to our defense.
There are the people that think we play a Tampa 2 again.
There are the people that think any zone coverage is bad and indicates we're going back to the Ron Meeks days.
There are the people who think this is a good defense for not spending a lot (that was never true even in the Polian days, but even if it was it would have nothing to do with this defense).
I do think the pitfalls of a defense like this are pretty well-known. You can't sit back in zone too much and let a QB slice you up little by little. You can't get away with playing 4 DEs on the DL every snap. You can't vacate the middle of the field and expect to get any stops.
But just about any modern NFL defense (read: NOT the Tampa 2) can be successful with good players.
What I find interesting is the lack of stars on Dallas' defense. Outside of Lawrence, they don't really have superstars.
|
One rule of thumb I employ is to ignore or push back on anyone who deals in absolutes.
As for that Dallas defense, LVE and Jaylon Smith are becoming two of the best LBs in football. That defense is fast and physical, which is exactly what I think Ballard and Eberflus want.