Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt
no
i judge coaches on how they handle in game situations. how the team operates as a whole. and this was a real coach.
pagano was not. keep defending pagano dude. everyone can see it but you. we always could.
this team was missing their starting tackles and compensated with a gameplan. that is coaching. pagano would have never let that happen.
you are wrong as always
|
Like I said, you judge them on offensive gameplan. Nothing you mentioned isn't about offense. Pagano was awful at offensive gameplan, as I mentioned several times throughout his tenure, and Reich was obviously very good at that today. Even compensating for missing OTs is, you guessed it, offensive gameplan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88
You're fucking delusional if you couldn't see the night and day difference between Pagano's staff and Reich's staff in this one game alone.
|
I did. It's called offensive gameplan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck
Where did you get that?
|
His original point #3 and follow up post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88
5. I know it pissed off people in the game thread, but I stand firmly against ever taking an offensive guard #6 overall. Nelson won some, lost some today. But at the end of the day: Colts still couldn't run the ball (especially up the middle) and Luck still got hit a lot. You can say "yeah well that's because ____ was playing" and you're not wrong, but it just shows my larger point: one offensive guard's impact on an OL is minimal. Luck had more of a pocket to step into, so not saying this line is as bad as last year at all ... clearly it's better. Still, is it #6 overall pick impact better? I don't think so.
|
What I've been saying all along. It would take a lot to convince me that Nelson will have a bigger impact over the course of his career than whoever the Colts would've picked with 12 and 22, and today did nothing to help that case.