Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt
That's an odd way to look at it. Makes pretty much zero sense
|
Really?
Teams make decisions all the time to move on from high priced talent because they have lower priced talent behind them that they believe will fill the void left.
Trading Allen created a void as a receiving option on the 2017 Colts. I am going to judge that trade based on if the lower priced talent on the team fills the void or not.
If the offense don't not skip a beat in 2017, then good trade. If it struggles because no one steps up as a 4th trusted pass catching option, then bad trade.
What is hard to understand about that?
Cheers,
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk