View Single Post
  #14  
Old 12-29-2017, 08:16 PM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,989
Thanks: 2,725
Thanked 1,663 Times in 716 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt Classic View Post
Not sure if this question fits better here or in the head coaching search thread, but with the players who will be back versus what is still needed, is it a given that the defense will stay as a 3-4 or could a coach be considered who would want to scrap that and go back to 4-3?
Sheard could be a hand in the dirt 4-3 DE. So could Chubb.
Hankins, Woods, Grover as NTs.
Anderson, Hunt, Ridgeway as UTs

Simon could be an WOLB.
Mingo? SOLB perhaps.

MLB? At least we would need to find less of them!

Secondary? I don't think it changes much.

So, sure. We could move to a 4-3. Need some more DEs and OLBs along with our ILB/MLB mess but we could do it.

Walk Worthy,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post:
Colt Classic (12-30-2017)