Quote:
Originally Posted by ChoppedWood
My guess, there's a tape. I have no sources, no whisper in my ear from a closely related person, just trying to be logical. The man sucks, he absolutely sucks at what he does. He is incredibly arrogant and full of himself. She holds the keys to a multi-billion dollar asset. Just trying to apply logic to arrive at why a person with her wealth and power would keep around an employee that sucks as bad as he sucks. Under nearly all scenarios someone as shitty as he is would be told to kick rocks. He hasn't been so I try to figure out why. My rationale, a tape.
So there's my theory. You won't like it, but that's fine, you don't have to.
|
o
It's not a matter of whether or not I like your theory.
You didn't say that it was a theory. You didn't preface your statement with "I believe that Chris Ballard, etc" ...... you stated it as fact, and when I questioned you about it you doubled down on your claim and rhetorically asked me if I had ever seen him speak before a microphone, as though it's common knowledge that your assertion that Chris Ballard was a conniving, vindictive character who will necessarily do everything that he can to bring people down with him.
If you are now backing up and saying that it's just a theory of yours, fine. You believe that Chris Ballard is a vindictive little prick. He may be a vindictive little prick.....but that's not what you said in the first place, and that was not your first response to my question when I asked you about it.
o