View Single Post
  #75  
Old 12-03-2023, 02:58 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,198
Thanks: 817
Thanked 2,913 Times in 1,382 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles View Post
o


Because it was a double change-of-possession. They ruled that Levis fumbled it, that our Colts player recovered it, and then he fumbled it back to the Titans.

o
That was obviously not a fumble by Levis. His arm was moving forward. It was an incomplete pass.

It would have been overturned on that basis alone.
Reply With Quote