View Single Post
  #45  
Old 02-22-2022, 08:46 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,056
Thanks: 2,384
Thanked 2,516 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
I think we're getting our wires mixed up on what we're debating. I'm saying that I hope the Colts are able to trade Wentz instead of cut him b/c it would be better for the Colts. We'd not have to carry his salary as dead money against the cap and get something in return for him vs. having to take the cap hit and get nothing in return for him. This is undisputable. Now you could argue that it would be better to keep Wentz than trade him, which IMO we're better off long term trading him, but that's not what I've been saying.

I fully agree that if Ballard has the opportunity to bring in a top tier QB then he should do damn near whatever it takes to do so. We've seen what Wentz is, and if we want to get better than maybe make the playoffs if we don't collapse type team then we need to be better at QB.
I dont think a team is going to do the Colts a favor by taking Wentz off their hands with favorable terms.

Im taking the worse case possible. They cant dump Wentz on someone else and they dont trust his play. So that means spending what capital they have and solve the Qb situation while they have the O line and RB to make it work
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
Spike (02-22-2022)