Quote:
Originally Posted by natagu23
Stop it.
Brady could literally win two more superbowls and Colt fans would still say Manning was the better Qb when it took two great post-season defensive runs/team to get Manning his rings.
Again, when it comes to clutch... Brady has the come back drives and rings to prove it. Meanwhile as a Colts fan, I know how mediocre Manning was in the 2007 post season, and I saw the Broncos' defense literally carry Manning to a Superbowl.
So, clutch doesn't count for anything?
|
look motherfucker
how did tom brady get his reputation? off adam vinitieris foot and cheating. he throws 3 yard passes and lets his guys make the plays. he is a fucking game manager. he always has a very solid to great defense and a good running game. his protection has been stellar throughout his career
if you want to actually look at football, and take away the moronic shit you hear on espn or read on espn or whatever else you look at, there has never been a better qb than manning. and we all know i wasn't his biggest fan.
anyone who has watched the game for the last 20 years and doesn't say manning isn't the best qb they have seen is
1) a liar
2) stupid
3) has no idea about the sport other than a superficial glance at it on sundays
even the stat i pointed out is retarded. but yet most people will eat it up. manning is something like 3 of 4 against brady in championship games. they don't play each other. yet morons will lap that dumbass stat up like it is covered in gravy.
rex ryan said it best. and i will paraphrase. it wasn't if manning would figure you out, it was when. nobody knew the game like manning. and you factor in what he did and compare it to brady? it isn't even close.
brady is a figment of espn's imagination. an east coast bias. strip away all the fucking nonsense you have heard from talk radio or tv and make the case for brady. i fucking dare you