It's a better option than giving up the massive amounts of draft capital I'm seeing as potential trades online. I'd rather give up those two players, good as they are, than give up this year's entire Day 1 and Day 2 and draft picks (plural) next year including next year's 1 and in some cases an additional Day 2 pick. Now, if the trade is something somewhat reasonable like what Matt Miller proposed (4, 35, this year's 4, next year's 3), give up the draft capital instead, but there comes a point where the players are cheaper than the draft capital, especially when you consider the baggage they come with.

o


There is ...... it's called "Indianapolis Colts Discission."

o

Any conversation with Dam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ

No, it's not.

Stop contradicting me!

o


Former Ohio State Star Reportedly Has NFL World ‘Buzzing’ at Combine

(By Lauren Merola)

https://athlonsports.com/nfl/former-...ing-at-combine

o

This guy has become my slight favorite among the four top QBs.

Agreed. He has the least concerning “issues” IMO and still has plenty of room to grow. Basically he seems to have the lowest floor with probably the second highest ceiling - behind maybe AR. And AR is a huge gamble. I wouldn’t necessarily be upset if the team went with any of the other 3 guys, but with what I have seen Stroud would be my choice.

Ballard is going to have to be aggressive for a change & trade up & fast. Two things he is not known for

It all depends on their evaluations. If there is a clear cut guy then I agree - go get him. But if their evaluations are close then stay put and save the future picks. I prefer Stroud, but I can be talked into any of them. So I’d stay at 4 and take the best available.