![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Is it me or does Nelson look like a window licker?
|
Quote:
|
Bills apparently were willing to give up both 1st rd picks and a 2nd rd pick:
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/h...ey-chubb-fell/ They had that deal in place with the broncos but fell through when Chubb was still there. I'm sure they would have offered the same deal to Ballard, but supposedly he wouldn't budge and wanted Nelson. Man, I don't know, two 1st rd picks and another 2nd, I think I would have let Nelson go and take that deal. |
It wasn't a freestanding 2nd - the Broncos would have had to return a 3rd to the Bills. My guess is that this component would have disappeared in a Colts trade, since theoretically the Bills were getting a slightly lower 1st round pick in return - so probably our #1 for the Bills two #1s would have been the likely offer.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
By contrast, the offer the Bills made the Broncos at #5 was a bit better (nos. #12, #22 and an exchange of a Bills second round pick for a Broncos’ third round pick) and totals 2115 points – assuming the 2nd and 3rd being exchanged were the earlier of each team’s pick. Thus, if the Bills had offered the Colts the #12 and #22 picks together, the resulting point total (1980 points) would fit nicely between the two offers. |
Quote:
|
If Nelson is who is supposed to be I would rather have him than the two firsts. If we can build a dominant offense line it would totally change the face of this team. In any event hope Ballard made the correct decision
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That never stopped an argument on the internet! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.