ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Colts fire OC Marcus Brady (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=152919)

Oldcolt 11-03-2022 01:26 PM

The nature of the lying by Belecheat is way different. First and foremost, he wins Super Bowls. When he says he has it covered, he actually does. He isn’t up there pretending to be your pastor, somehow occupying the moral high ground, and throwing people under the bus. Beyond that, I am talking about this team. Everyone does it so it’s ok doesn’t fly with me as an excuse. I don’t need an update on every injury, on every player. I would just like some honesty once in a while. Men, at least the men I admired as i grew up (my dad and my uncles were all WWII veterans-those were men who didn’t brag-would kick my ass when I even tried to-and took responsibility even if it wasn’t theirs) would quit themselves before throwing a subordinate (who had no real power) under the bus. Different world now.

JAFF 11-03-2022 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcubed (Post 247723)
I dont believe the 'got paid and coast theory' that some spout.

I think its a combo of lingering injuries and not fully recovering from covid.

So many things have happened during the covid pandemic. Its not just who got sick and who passed. There is collateral damage that cant be measured

ColtBlue 11-03-2022 04:19 PM

So let me get this straight about these COVID and injury comments I have been reading.

Colts were the only team that got COVID?

Colts are the only team that deals with injuries?

Damn everything makes prefect sense of why this team is awful....

IndyNorm 11-03-2022 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosTheory (Post 247705)
Wait a second. This is nothing unique to Frank Reich or the Colts. Bill Belichick is considered the GOAT and he's famous for giving bullshit pressers. They all do.

Beyond the competitive aspect... reporters and fans claim they want honesty but the moment there's an aberration and someone does speak some truth or specifics, about an injury or anything else, people lose their minds. That's why coach-speak is a thing. They don't want to be there, they don't want to talk to these robot reporters.

This is simply the nature of the garbage (sports) media that people ask for. These reporters have been asking the same goddamn questions and getting the same goddamn non-answers forever. If they didn't get special access to practices and stuff like that, they'd be useless.

Every player and coach will tell you the opponent this week is a "great team" and "they do a lot of stuff really well." The coach and GM always makes every single decision "in the best interest of the team." The winning quarterback in the post-game interview is going to tell the lady, "My teammates had my back" and "we believe in each other", and blah, blah, blah.

That's what people eat up.

It's more that organizations and people don't want to deal w/ the BS from both the news/sports media and social media if they say something considered out of line. Remember how much was made out of Peyton finally saying "Ok, we had protection problems today" after the media was hounding the shit out of him about it after we were upset by the Steelers in the '05 playoffs? And that was before social media was a thing, so it'd be 50x worse today.

IndyNorm 11-03-2022 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcubed (Post 247723)
I dont believe the 'got paid and coast theory' that some spout.

I think its a combo of lingering injuries and not fully recovering from covid.

I agree. Probably just a coincidence that his play went to shit after getting paid. My guess is that it's his back, which if that's the case then (as mentioned before) it makes Ballard one dumbass mfer for signing him to such a huge contract.

Luck4Reich 11-03-2022 06:41 PM

Reich says that Brady was not a scapegoat........ Well I beg to differ lol

ChaosTheory 11-03-2022 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndyNorm (Post 247779)
It's more that organizations and people don't want to deal w/ the BS from both the news/sports media and social media if they say something considered out of line. Remember how much was made out of Peyton finally saying "Ok, we had protection problems today" after the media was hounding the shit out of him about it after we were upset by the Steelers in the '05 playoffs? And that was before social media was a thing, so it'd be 50x worse today.

100% my point, yeah. And it's not just sports, but these journalists will piss and moan about coach-speak and vague, politically correct responses... well how did we get to the point where these 21-year-old kids are working with PR consultants and media coaches before they're even out of college?

It's because these chicken hawks that do the reporting can't wait to pounce, put on their Freud hats, then twist and dissect every syllable. And they do that because that's what the readers want.

Coaches will give you some measurable facts like who's starting this week or something. But as for honest thinking and opinion... this is what you end up with. Canned, robotic, meaningless, PC exchanges.

YDFL Commish 11-03-2022 06:58 PM

In the words of Johnny U..."Talk is cheap let's go play"

IndyNorm 11-03-2022 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosTheory (Post 247789)
100% my point, yeah. And it's not just sports, but these journalists will piss and moan about coach-speak and vague, politically correct responses... well how did we get to the point where these 21-year-old kids are working with PR consultants and media coaches before they're even out of college?

It's because these chicken hawks that do the reporting can't wait to pounce, put on their Freud hats, then twist and dissect every syllable. And they do that because that's what the readers want.

Coaches will give you some measurable facts like who's starting this week or something. But as for honest thinking and opinion... this is what you end up with. Canned, robotic, meaningless, PC exchanges.

No doubt. The media and the masses have created this pc monster.

Brylok 11-03-2022 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 247737)
So many things have happened during the covid pandemic. Its not just who got sick and who passed. There is collateral damage that cant be measured

I had the OG COVID in January of 2021 before vaccine was available for us peasants. Ever since then, regardless of season, weather, or anything else, my nose starts running. It's just a trickle and it's usually my right nostril for whatever reason, but it's constant. I blow my nose 50+ times a day, every day. It's really annoying and I go through Kleenex like a mofo, but other people have far worse than that.

ColtBlue 11-03-2022 11:55 PM

https://media.tenor.com/czXaOlFuracA...ck-shit-up.gif

ColtBlue 11-04-2022 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndyNorm (Post 247656)
If Nelson's back is the reason why he sucks now then that is HUGE fuck up by Ballard to give him that big of a contract. The smart thing to have done, again if he is having back issues, would have been to let him play out his 5th year option to see how his back impacted his play before handing him the largest OG contract in league history. Of course Ballard hasn't done many smart things the past couple of years.

I think Ballard i s a idiot anyways for his stupid contract for Nelson. I think he still had a rookie year left before re signing. But yes Nelson Back injury worse than what Colts are saying. If you really want to know dumbest Ballard drafts I can show you. Pretty sure you already know but some keep backing him up.

ColtBlue 11-04-2022 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColtBlue (Post 247818)
I think Ballard i s a idiot anyways for his stupid contract for Nelson. I think he still had a rookie year left before re signing. But yes Nelson Back injury worse than what Colts are saying. If you really want to know dumbest Ballard drafts I can show you. Pretty sure you already know but some keep backing him up.



DE Benjamin Chinomso Banogu
S Hooker
OT Zach Banner
CB Quincy Wilson
Edge Tarrell Basham

DE Gerri Green
OT Jackson Barton

WR Daurice Fountain

C/G Javon Patterson
QB Jacob Eason

DT Robert Windsor

WR Dezmon Patmon

LB Jordan Glasgow
S Shawn Davis

I'm tired do I need to go on?

ColtBlue 11-04-2022 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColtBlue (Post 247820)
DE Benjamin Chinomso Banogu
S Hooker
OT Zach Banner
CB Quincy Wilson
Edge Tarrell Basham

DE Gerri Green
OT Jackson Barton

WR Daurice Fountain

C/G Javon Patterson
QB Jacob Eason

DT Robert Windsor

WR Dezmon Patmon

LB Jordan Glasgow
S Shawn Davis

I'm tired do I need to go on?

Ballard isn't prefect and neither is Frank. I trust Frank more cause he at least does pressers when Ballard hides.... LMFAO

ColtBlue 11-04-2022 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColtBlue (Post 247821)
Ballard isn't prefect and neither is Frank. I trust Frank more cause he at least does pressers when Ballard hides.... LMFAO

But Ballard hasn't done regular season pressers since Luck went out in 2017. I might be wrong. Just crazy how this team has left this earth and no communication from above coach. Coach takes everything up the ass and skull fucked.. That's what he signed up for....Carry on

Racehorse 11-04-2022 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brylok (Post 247813)
I had the OG COVID in January of 2021 before vaccine was available for us peasants. Ever since then, regardless of season, weather, or anything else, my nose starts running. It's just a trickle and it's usually my right nostril for whatever reason, but it's constant. I blow my nose 50+ times a day, every day. It's really annoying and I go through Kleenex like a mofo, but other people have far worse than that.

I agree about the runny nose. Much more frequent since Covid got me, and my case was a very mild one.

Colts And Orioles 11-04-2022 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brylok (Post 247813)



I had the OG COVID in January of 2021 before vaccine was available for us peasants. Ever since then, regardless of season, weather, or anything else, my nose starts running. It's just a trickle and it's usually my right nostril for whatever reason, but it's constant. I blow my nose 50+ times a day, every day. It's really annoying and I go through Kleenex like a mother-fucker, but other people have far worse than that.




o


That sounds pretty fucking scary.

I've gotten 5 COVID shots ...... 2 for the full vaccine, and 3 boosters.

I suppose that I am currently one of the more fortunate ones in that specific area.

o

Colts And Orioles 11-04-2022 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 247737)



So many things have happened during the covid pandemic. Its not just who got sick and who passed. There is collateral damage that cant be measured.




o


Nobody dies anymore. Thanks to our fear of death, we can pretend that we won't die, we'll simply "pass away."


GEORGE CARLIN, 1990 (in regard to euphemisms)



By the way, Ray Guy died yesterday ...... kidney stones "pass", people die.

o

JAFF 11-04-2022 11:13 AM

Like everyone else, I waited when my age group could get the shot. Ive received 5 shots, but still got a mild case. I think, cant prove being on meds for cholesterol, and aspirin helped my reaction.

Brylok 11-04-2022 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 247845)
o


That sounds pretty fucking scary.

I've gotten 5 COVID shots ...... 2 for the full vaccine, and 3 boosters.

I suppose that I am currently one of the more fortunate ones in that specific area.

o

Blowing my nose all the time isn't scary, it's just annoying. Having zero taste or smell (of anything) for over a week was kinda scary. I got my fourth COVID shot on Wednesday (another booster).

Dam8610 11-04-2022 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ColtBlue (Post 247820)
DE Benjamin Chinomso Banogu
S Hooker
OT Zach Banner
CB Quincy Wilson
Edge Tarrell Basham

DE Gerri Green
OT Jackson Barton

WR Daurice Fountain

C/G Javon Patterson
QB Jacob Eason

DT Robert Windsor

WR Dezmon Patmon

LB Jordan Glasgow
S Shawn Davis

I'm tired do I need to go on?

Would you like me to pull up the draft busts of the Chiefs, Bills, Bengals, 49ers...pretty much any successful team in the NFL recently except the Los Angeles George Allens, who have decided "Eff them picks"? It's going to be a long list for any team. Anyone who follows the draft at all knows 50% is a fantastic success rate on draft picks. The rate at which Ballard pulls quality starters from the draft is incredibly high.

Chaka 11-05-2022 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rm1369 (Post 247590)
Chaka you and I have been having this discussion for 3-4 years. And guess what? We are exactly where I have been saying we would end up - mediocre.

I’m not so sure what is hard to understand. Ballard has never fielded a complete team. Never. Yes every team has some degree of weakness. It’s a matter of magnitude. And Ballard has repeatedly left several major areas extremely weak while waiting on player development or next years draft. LT, WR, and DE primarily. Ballard refuses to “overspend” on average NFL talent. Great, except that means the team has repeatedly put out below average players at critical positions each and every year. Having a few great players that carry the bad players works in the NBA, it doesn’t in the NFL. You get exposed. If you have bottom 5 pass rush it doesn’t matter how great your LBs and secondary are. Oline can’t block? Doesn’t matter much you have the best RB in the league or have maybe finally solved the WR issue. We’ve seen it year after year - an obvious issue the team says is fine, then it costs them games and they spend half the season trying to find a solution.

Where this intersects with Ballard’s approach to the cap is that other teams do mortgage some of the future for today. Instead of filling holes with rookies and vet minimum guys they shoot their shot and shore up areas with over paid average players. It doesn’t always work, but it sure as fuck beats what Ballard does. Do the colts have a brighter future than the rams? Maybe. But the Rams have something to show for prioritizing a window. I guess Ballard’s is yet to come

That doesn’t even touch how he’s been fucking up at QB. I mostly give him a pass there. It’s an unbelievable difficult task, but one he makes more difficult by his “building a dynasty” philosophy.

Let me ask you - how many more years does Ballard need to prove what you and him believe? I said it was at best a 4 year plan before competitiveness using his method. Most on here, especially you, told me I was nuts. So I’ll ask - how much longer until the genius reveals itself?

Well, we certainly disagree but I doubt I ever said you were crazy. Look, the Colts have been competitive since Ballard got here, with the exception of the Luck retirement year (and the 2017 season when Ballard was just hired, and Luck was unavailable).

Ballard's strategy is predicated on the homegrown players maintaining their level of performance. That's been a problem this year, for some weird reason that nobody has figured out. Except where injuries played a role, the weak spots on the roster are Ballard's responsibility in large part (though I'm certain he also receives input from coaches, scouts etc. on players like Pryor before deciding to give him the starting spot), and in most cases he's got a young, high draft pick in place for the future.

And the simple reality is that the elite teams tend to have elite QBs, and the Colts haven't had that despite their best efforts to the contrary. I'm glad you're willing to give Ballard a pass on the QB issue, because I think it's warranted. No matter how much people hate him now, Wentz was a worthwhile gamble. The other, more veteran QBs were also probably the right move for a team that, by all accounts, otherwise seemed ready to compete.

I've never said Ballard is perfect, but I'm convinced that Ballard's strategy is solid. If he's run out of Indy with pitchforks, he'll just succeed elsewhere.

Chaka 11-05-2022 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndyNorm (Post 247643)
You know damn well that Ballard will use how much he's invested in the OL as an excuse not to invest in FA to fill team needs. He certainly won't invest any more in the OL even thought that's the unit that obviously needs to be fixed. In fact he already did that by letting Glow, Reed, and Fisher walk and going cheap w/ Pryor and Pinter :mad:

An excuse? Do you think he just doesn't want to spend money because he's cheap? And letting Glow, Reed and Fisher walk? Fisher's now out of football, Reed is a Vikings backup who's been designated as inactive for nearly every game this year, and Glowinski was the weakest link on the Colts line asking for a big payday.

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndyNorm (Post 247643)
You don't judge a decision by the outcome it creates? What kind of dumbass thinking is that? And BTW handing over the starting LT position to a journeyman backup who made a whopping 1 start there is not a reasonable and logical decision. This was pretty obvious to a lot of us on the board here. Pinter wasn't as obvious to us fans, but it should have been obvious to Ballard and his staff. They had 2 years worth of practices and workouts to evaluate him, and the fact that they were so far off on his evaluation as well as Pryor's should say something.

Correct. I don't judge a person's decisionmaking simply by the simple bottomline result. This kind of "dumbass thinking" might be beyond you, but think of it like how a poker player makes decisions - a good poker player plays the odds, and makes decisions accordingly. The outcome of those decisions is not always consistent with what the odds would suggest, but the player can rest assured that if you keep making smart decisions, they will prevail in the end. The entire casino industry is based upon this principle.

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndyNorm (Post 247643)
AC seemed like a really standup guy. Do you think he'd tell the media that he was considering retiring and not talk to Ballard, Reich, etc. about it?

Off the top of my head I would have either signed Leno instead of Fisher and/or drafted Darrisaw instead of Paye. And as I already mentioned re-signing Fisher would have been a much better move than handing the job over to Pryor. But my opinion doesn't really matter as I don't get paid to make the Colts better. Ballard does, and that's something he's failed at big fucking time over the past couple of off seasons. Fucking Matt Broken Down Turnstyle Pryor at LT. What a fucking joke.

You missed my point. Do you know what Castonzo told the Colts his intentions were when he resigned for two years? I mean I think the guy was 32 at the time, so it's not unreasonable to think he might follow though on the contract and play for a couple years.

Chaka 11-05-2022 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldcolt (Post 247724)
The nature of the lying by Belecheat is way different. First and foremost, he wins Super Bowls. When he says he has it covered, he actually does. He isn’t up there pretending to be your pastor, somehow occupying the moral high ground, and throwing people under the bus.

I have to disagree here Oldcolt. How many Super Bowls has Belichick won without Brady? The answer is exactly "Zero." Belichick doesn't even have a winning record (in New England or elsewhere) in games without Brady. Here's a recent article discussing it:

https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nf...hout-tom-brady

In short, Belichick's record is an astounding 217-64 (77.4% win rate) with Brady, but without Brady it's a very pedestrian 72-82 (46.7% win rate). Even removing his five unsuccessful early years with the Browns, he's still under .500 (36-38) in New England without Brady.

Brady, by contrast, had a record of 24-9 (72.7% win rate) away from Belichick coming into the season, not to mention a Super Bowl win. The win rate has dropped a little after he unretired and returned this season, but it's still 27-14 (65.8%) by my calculations. So it's not like there was some sort of Brady-Belichick magic and they are both struggling away from each other.

So maybe Belichick isn't the genius everyone assumes he is? Just like the everyone else, and even with the added benefit of his cheating ways, he struggles mightily without a top end QB. Moreover, in this season, after following the seemingly preferred strategy of drafting a future QB in the first round last year (and one who lots of "experts" claimed prior to the season was the best of his class, while again trumpeting Belichick's genius), the Patriots are 4-4 and mired in a QB controversy.

By comparison, in the post-Luck era (2019 and afterwards, including this year), Reich has a record of 30-26-1 (53.6% win rate).

ChaosTheory 11-05-2022 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaka (Post 247932)
Correct. I don't judge a person's decisionmaking simply by the simple bottomline result. This kind of "dumbass thinking" might be beyond you, but think of it like how a poker player makes decisions - a good poker player plays the odds, and makes decisions accordingly. The outcome of those decisions is not always consistent with what the odds would suggest, but the player can rest assured that if you keep making smart decisions, they will prevail in the end.

That's the perfect analogy.

rm1369 11-05-2022 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaka (Post 247931)
Well, we certainly disagree but I doubt I ever said you were crazy. Look, the Colts have been competitive since Ballard got here, with the exception of the Luck retirement year (and the 2017 season when Ballard was just hired, and Luck was unavailable).

Our definition of competitive is different. I’m talking competitive for Super Bowls or at least conference titles games, not wild card spots. And even then his record is spotty. I expect more - especially after so many years in charge and all the preaching to be patient because he was building a dynasty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaka (Post 247931)
Ballard's strategy is predicated on the homegrown players maintaining their level of performance. That's been a problem this year, for some weird reason that nobody has figured out. Except where injuries played a role, the weak spots on the roster are Ballard's responsibility in large part (though I'm certain he also receives input from coaches, scouts etc. on players like Pryor before deciding to give him the starting spot), and in most cases he's got a young, high draft pick in place for the future.

Having someone in place for the future means shit for that season. And that is the point. Signing Rivers and trading for Ryan should have been win now moves, except Ballard never acted like it with the rest of the roster. He left holes to be addressed later. He has done that every year, but it’s especially egregious those two years.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaka (Post 247931)
And the simple reality is that the elite teams tend to have elite QBs, and the Colts haven't had that despite their best efforts to the contrary. I'm glad you're willing to give Ballard a pass on the QB issue, because I think it's warranted. No matter how much people hate him now, Wentz was a worthwhile gamble. The other, more veteran QBs were also probably the right move for a team that, by all accounts, otherwise seemed ready to compete.

I can make an argument to justify most of his QB moves. I don’t necessarily agree with his handling though. Continuing to focus on the rest of the roster while hoping to luck into a QB hasn’t made sense to me as an overall strategy. The good things he has built will likely be being dismantled by the time they have the position solved. Especially considering Ballard is unlikely to “overpay” to move up in the draft to acquire one. Unless Irsay dictates it now.

And again - Rivers and Ryan are justifiably to me only if you believe you were trying to win. Yet Ballard left major holes unaddressed with the idea they’ll be fixed in the future. He made “win now” moves at QB but treated the rest of the roster as a rebuilding year. He did this in the name of the financial responsibility and flexibility you promote. I’m still waiting to see the benefits of this system on the field.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaka (Post 247931)
I've never said Ballard is perfect, but I'm convinced that Ballard's strategy is solid. If he's run out of Indy with pitchforks, he'll just succeed elsewhere.

Until he changes his philosophy he will have to hang his hat on his talent evaluation and not on his team building. There is a difference

YDFL Commish 11-05-2022 07:08 PM

It took BP, what 8/9 years to bring the Colts a championship. Getting rid of Mora was a key, just like I believe getting rid of Reich will be a key.

rm1369 11-05-2022 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 247953)
It took BP, what 8/9 years to bring the Colts a championship. Getting rid of Mora was a key, just like I believe getting rid of Reich will be a key.

There is no comparison between those teams. From the franchise QB to the record, completely different situations. However I have said that Ballard’s conservative approach reminds me of Polian’s approach that held arguably the best QB in history to one SB victory. Imagine what that method will lead to with no QB.

Oldcolt 11-06-2022 08:22 AM

Chaka. Interesting take, one that literally nobody on this board had when Brady and NE were battling it out for supremacy with the Colts. Every Colt fan thought that the Colts had the better QB with Manning/Luck, at least on this board with the arguments we had with those NE idiots. Now it is all about Brady being the GOAT? In either event we both had a top QB for years, we finished that with one Super Bowl, Belecheat has what 7? To even argue that somehow Belecheat didn’t make a difference is ridiculous, coaching counts in this league and always had. We need a new leader on this team, a new direction where there is some accountability. I would like to see someone who has a little SOB in them. You make 20 million a year and play like shit you deserve to be publicly called out. It it it to much for their macho feelings they have plenty of money to get therapy.

IndyNorm 11-06-2022 08:27 PM

Quote:

An excuse? Do you think he just doesn't want to spend money because he's cheap?
Year in and year out Ballard sacrifices team needs in the name of future cap flexibility. You know damn if left unchecked he'll continue to do so, and since he's already invested so much of the cap space in the OL he'll continue to find cheap band aid like replacements for the open positions rather than do the right thing and actually fix the problem.

Quote:

And letting Glow, Reed and Fisher walk? Fisher's now out of football, Reed is a Vikings backup who's been designated as inactive for nearly every game this year, and Glowinski was the weakest link on the Colts line asking for a big payday.
After watching the god awful OL play this year it's obvious that Glow wasn't the weak link of the OL. If re-signed he'd be our best OG currently on the roster, and since Nelson's play has gone to complete shit the same can probably be said for Reed as well. Even though he's out of football if we had re-signed Fisher he would have currently been our best LT, and certainly a hell of a lot better than Pryor is. Hell, even if Fisher had sat on the couch since January he'd still be better than Pryor.


Quote:

Correct. I don't judge a person's decision making simply by the simple bottomline result. This kind of "dumbass thinking" might be beyond you, but think of it like how a poker player makes decisions - a good poker player plays the odds, and makes decisions accordingly. The outcome of those decisions is not always consistent with what the odds would suggest, but the player can rest assured that if you keep making smart decisions, they will prevail in the end. The entire casino industry is based upon this principle.
No, what you're saying isn't beyond me, and nothing you've ever posted on here is beyond me or anyone else on the board. And yes, it's a dumbass line of thinking. For starters Ballard's role is nothing like being a professional gambler and running a football team is nothing like running a casino where the odds are always in your favor.

Ballard is essentially a VP of talent acquisition at a midsized company. Imagine if he was in the business world and decided due to potential future budget constraints to let ~half of the company's experienced talent in their top division leave rather than pay them a manageable salary increase. Then he backfills them w/ substandard talent who's completely incapable of performing at the required level, and as soon as this turnover happens the division begins to grossly underperform so much so that it drags the entire company down from being in the black to the heavy red. Do you think wise investors would say "That's ok. You gambled and lost, but I'm sure you'll get it right next time." No, they would (rightfully so) be calling for his head.

On top of that even if Ballard's job was exactly like a professional gambler, Pryor and Pinter were two of the worst horses in the history of the league to wager the season on, and Ballard should have known that.

Quote:

You missed my point. Do you know what Castonzo told the Colts his intentions were when he resigned for two years? I mean I think the guy was 32 at the time, so it's not unreasonable to think he might follow though on the contract and play for a couple years.
Do you honestly think Castonzo told the entire world that he was seriously considering retiring and then told Ballard that he'd stick around for the foreseeable future? If so then I have a great bridge investment opportunity I'd like to tell you about. And even if AC did say he'd stick around the fact that he was considering retiring at the end of the '19 season shouldn't have surprised Ballard when he did retire after '20. But the fact that Matt Fucking Pryor was our starting LT this season seems to speak otherwise.

YDFL Commish 11-06-2022 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IndyNorm (Post 248459)
Year in and year out Ballard sacrifices team needs in the name of future cap flexibility. You know damn if left unchecked he'll continue to do so, and since he's already invested so much of the cap space in the OL he'll continue to find cheap band aid like replacements for the open positions rather than do the right thing and actually fix the problem.



After watching the god awful OL play this year it's obvious that Glow wasn't the weak link of the OL. If re-signed he'd be our best OG currently on the roster, and since Nelson's play has gone to complete shit the same can probably be said for Reed as well. Even though he's out of football if we had re-signed Fisher he would have currently been our best LT, and certainly a hell of a lot better than Pryor is. Hell, even if Fisher had sat on the couch since January he'd still be better than Pryor.




No, what you're saying isn't beyond me, and nothing you've ever posted on here is beyond me or anyone else on the board. And yes, it's a dumbass line of thinking. For starters Ballard's role is nothing like being a professional gambler and running a football team is nothing like running a casino where the odds are always in your favor.

Ballard is essentially a VP of talent acquisition at a midsized company. Imagine if he was in the business world and decided due to potential future budget constraints to let ~half of the company's experienced talent in their top division leave rather than pay them a manageable salary increase. Then he backfills them w/ substandard talent who's completely incapable of performing at the required level, and as soon as this turnover happens the division begins to grossly underperform so much so that it drags the entire company down from being in the black to the heavy red. Do you think wise investors would say "That's ok. You gambled and lost, but I'm sure you'll get it right next time." No, they would (rightfully so) be calling for his head.

On top of that even if Ballard's job was exactly like a professional gambler, Pryor and Pinter were two of the worst horses in the history of the league to wager the season on, and Ballard should have known that.



Do you honestly think Castonzo told the entire world that he was seriously considering retiring and then told Ballard that he'd stick around for the foreseeable future? If so then I have a great bridge investment opportunity I'd like to tell you about. And even if AC did say he'd stick around the fact that he was considering retiring at the end of the '19 season shouldn't have surprised Ballard when he did retire after '20. But the fact that Matt Fucking Pryor was our starting LT this season seems to speak otherwise.

No Glow did god damn job, which is all you can expect of any player.

IndyNorm 11-06-2022 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish (Post 248463)
No Glow did god damn job, which is all you can expect of any player.

Yeah he did. And if it wasn't clear before this year then it sure is now. At least to those of us with at least half a brain.

Hoopsdoc 11-24-2022 11:50 AM

Brady reportedly hired as a consultant in Philly. Good for him.

He was a blatantly obvious scapegoat here. He was fired because Jim wasn’t ready to fire Frank yet and he needed a fall guy.

When that didn’t work, it was Franks turn.

You would think Ballard will be next if they keep losing, which they probably will.

What a total dumpster fire this season has been.

MeSayDayo 11-24-2022 12:42 PM

I don't really think any of us know if Brady was any good. Or what he was good at. Or bad at. Or if he ever wanted to call plays.
Obviously got promoted at some point, so must have been a decent QB coach at least.
Could also have been just Reich being overly loyal to his guys to a fault, which we had seen.
I remember Brady more as a QB because he played a number of years for my local CFL team, the Hamilton Tiger-Cats (same city Austin Collie was born)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.