ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Trade offers for Jacoby (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39262)

rcubed 09-24-2018 01:14 PM

Anyone want to change their mind on jacoby if San Fran comes calling?

Chromeburn 09-24-2018 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 61368)
Some fans never realized how bad some of those Manning o-lines were because he was getting the ball out and setting extra protection where it was needed.

You want to know how bad his lines were, Manning was the most hit QB after release. He was still getting hit, he just got the ball out before he did. That guy did more with less than just about anyone I have seen. He manipulated the game so much, he protected his oline and the bad defense.

That’s why I can never call Brady the goat. Always had a line, always had a D. First three SB’s were won by his kicker. Should have lost to the Seahawks, should have lost to the falcons. But that comeback against the Falcons I give major props for. However it only happens bc their D shut down the Falcons O. Brady goes down, and they go to the playoffs with Cassel. Manning goes down and the Colts are the worst team in the league.

Dam8610 09-24-2018 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcubed (Post 81936)
Anyone want to change their mind on jacoby if San Fran comes calling?

Are they calling with at least a 1?

Colts And Orioles 09-24-2018 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 61368)




Some fans never realized how bad some of those Manning o-lines were because he was getting the ball out and setting extra protection where it was needed.





o


I think that many of those fans DO realize this, they are just reluctant to admit it because of their own agenda/fandom reasons.


o


Quote:

Originally Posted by Chromeburn (Post 81942)



You want to know how bad his lines were, Manning was the most hit QB after release. He was still getting hit, he just got the ball out before he did. That guy did more with less than just about anyone I have seen. He manipulated the game so much, he protected his oline and the bad defense.

That’s why I can never call Brady the goat. Always had a line, always had a D. First three SB’s were won by his kicker. Should have lost to the Seahawks, should have lost to the falcons. But that comeback against the Falcons I give major props for. However it only happens bc their D shut down the Falcons O. Brady goes down, and they go to the playoffs with Cassel. Manning goes down and the Colts are the worst team in the league.




o


When Peyton Manning missed the entire 2011 season due to injury, the Colts lost their first 13 games of the season, and went 2-14 overall.

When Tom Brady missed the entire 2008 season, the Patriots went 11-5 with Matt Cassel at quarterback, and only missed the postseason because of a tiebreaker. In fact, they were only the second team ever to go 11-5 and miss the postseason (the 1985 Denver Broncos being the other) since the inaugural 16-game schedule season in 1978.


Terry Bradshaw was a very good quarterback, and he excelled in the postseason (particularly in bad-weather games.) And I believe that he is rightfully a member of the Hall-of-Fame. However, his being 4-0 in the Super Bowl as a starting quarterback (including two Super Bowl MVP awards) does not necessarily mean that he was a better quarterback than was Dan Marino, whose team was blown out by the 49ers by a score of 38-16 in the only Super Bowl that he ever reached.


Yes, Brady has made it to 8 Super Bowls, winning 5 of them. That doesn't necessarily make him a better quarterback than Peyton Manning, any more than Terry Bradshaw's 2 Super Bowl MVP's and 4 Super Bowl titles necessarily make him a better quarterback than Dan Marino.


Bart Stahr won 5 world championships as a starting quarterback also, but I don't think that that necessarily means that he was a better quarterback than John Elway, Johnny Unitas, Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, or Roger Staubach all were, either.


o

Chromeburn 09-24-2018 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 81965)
o


I think that many of those fans DO realize this, they are just reluctant to admit it because of their own agenda/fandom reasons.


o





o


When Peyton Manning missed the entire 2011 season due to injury, the Colts lost their first 13 games of the season, and went 2-14 overall.

When Tom Brady missed the entire 2008 season, the Patriots went 11-5 with Matt Cassel at quarterback, and only missed the postseason because of a tiebreaker. In fact, they were only the second team ever to go 11-5 and miss the postseason (the 1985 Denver Broncos being the other) since the inaugural 16-game schedule season in 1978.


Terry Bradshaw was a very good quarterback, and he excelled in the postseason (particularly in bad-weather games.) And I believe that he is rightfully a member of the Hall-of-Fame. However, his being 4-0 in the Super Bowl as a starting quarterback (including two Super Bowl MVP awards) does not necessarily mean that he was a better quarterback than was Dan Marino, whose team was blown out by the 49ers by a score of 38-16 in the only Super Bowl that he ever reached.


Yes, Brady has made it to 8 Super Bowls, winning 5 of them. That doesn't necessarily doesn't make him a better quarterback than Peyton Manning, any more than Terry Bradshaw's 2 Super Bowl MVP's and 4 Super Bowl titles necessarily make him a better quarterback than Dan Marino.


Bart Stahr won 5 world championships as a starting quarterback also, but I don't think that that necessarily means that he was a better quarterback than John Elway, Johnny Unitas, Aaron Rodgers, Drew Brees, or Roger Staubach all were, either.


o


If you use SB wins that is fine. Then Brady is your goat. But I don’t like simplistic measurements like that. I think the pats have made many average QBs look good in that system. Brady is accurate and reads D’s well, but he folds under pressure. Manning is the only QB to win SBs with two different teams. But that is simplistic as well. I do know you put a defense with manning and he will get you SB wins. Would Belicheat and Brady be the same without each other? Anyway, the game was different in the 70’s. I kind of consider Walsh and Montana as the start of the modern era. But even 80’s 90’s football was very different than today. Salary cap, parity, pass offenses and rules, WRs and their gloves with PI rules. It’s so different.

Of that era I would probably go Elway, Montana, Marino. But as a pure passer, hard to go against Marino.

rcubed 09-24-2018 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 81964)
Are they calling with at least a 1?

doubt it.

1965southpaw 09-24-2018 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcubed (Post 81936)
Anyone want to change their mind on jacoby if San Fran comes calling?

Nope....unless they offer a kings ransom in draft picks. Having a quality backup like Brisset is an essential element of a complete SB contending team (see Eagles last year). Why create another talent gap when we already have so many to fill to get back to being a SB contender?

As a side note.....3 games into the season and it looks like Dorset still isn't living up to his high draft pick. We definitely got the better end of that trade.

Dam8610 09-24-2018 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rcubed (Post 81981)
doubt it.

Then good luck with CJ Beathard.

JAFF 09-24-2018 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by testcase448 (Post 61355)
Heard it before...
Sort of an backhand slap at the o-line players on the roster.

Truth hurts. The eagles have a good pass rush and where playing deep covers. The colts couldnt get open deep.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.