ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   f.... Colts' chances of drafting Bradley Chubb impacted after Giants trade (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=39012)

Chromeburn 03-28-2018 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rm1369 (Post 61442)
May make the Hankins release make some sense.

We will grab a DT somewhere in the draft. There are a couple good DTs that should fit.

Chromeburn 03-28-2018 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeveJones007 (Post 61444)
The Hail Mary is that Hurst has enough questions in his medicals to push him to 2.04.

If only, I would love him for our defense.

testcase448 03-30-2018 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 61396)
A Top 10 pick next year is a lot more likely drafting Nelson than drafting Chubb.

I agree, the problem is Denver will take Chubb at five.

However another way to look at it, Luck may live through 2018 if we take Nelson

I believe we'll trade down again, to Buffalo leaving us at 12, and a second tier pick like Landry

And a early pick for the next few years... and an easy AFC south fourth place schedule as the cherry on top of the shit Sunday

Dam8610 03-30-2018 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by testcase448 (Post 61557)
I agree, the problem is Denver will take Chubb at five.

Out of all the teams in the top 5, Denver is the least likely to take Chubb.

YDFL Commish 03-30-2018 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 61574)
Out of all the teams in the top 5, Denver is the least likely to take Chubb.

But they sure could use Nelson.

VeveJones007 03-30-2018 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 61574)
Out of all the teams in the top 5, Denver is the least likely to take Chubb.

Their the least likely, except for the Jets. And Buffalo if they move up to #2 or #4.

Racehorse 03-30-2018 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 61574)
Out of all the teams in the top 5, Denver is the least likely to take Chubb.

He knows that, but wants to troll. One of these days we will learn to stop feeding the trolls.

testcase448 03-31-2018 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 61574)
Out of all the teams in the top 5, Denver is the least likely to take Chubb.

Best player left' they WILL grab him.

WHO else do they take? nobody else wotrh a top 5

Dam8610 03-31-2018 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by testcase448 (Post 61630)
Best player left' they WILL grab him.

WHO else do they take? nobody else wotrh a top 5

A QB. You're crazy if you think they're committed to Case Keenum, or that they'd take (yet another) pass rusher over the QB they desperately need.

albany ed 03-31-2018 06:30 AM

Here's how I see it. They'll hold at 6 and see what happens in the first 5 selections. If it is a run on QBs and RB, then they'll take Chubb. If he and Nelson are both gone, that means quality QBs remain and they'll trade down to one of the QB hungry teams. Win - win.

VeveJones007 03-31-2018 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by albany ed (Post 61633)
Here's how I see it. They'll hold at 6 and see what happens in the first 5 selections. If it is a run on QBs and RB, then they'll take Chubb. If he and Nelson are both gone, that means quality QBs remain and they'll trade down to one of the QB hungry teams. Win - win.

I’m guessing this factored into the initial decision to trade down to 6. Still good options from there. Hell, they might get what Buffalo was offering for 3, while also getting those three 2s from NY.

rm1369 03-31-2018 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dam8610 (Post 61631)
A QB. You're crazy if you think they're committed to Case Keenum, or that they'd take (yet another) pass rusher over the QB they desperately need.

I don’t think they are committed to Keenum long term, but I could see them making a last run with their current core. I agree that in that case Nelson probably makes more sense. If they had their 1st choice at QB sure. I just don’t see it if it’s their 4th choice. It will likely come down to how they rank them and how they come off the board. The idea they have to take a QB no matter who it is is crazy given the signing of Keenum and the rest of their roster.

It sounds like Ballard has a 4th non QB he puts on the level of Chubb, Nelson, and Barkley. I think that’s why he was so comfortable moving down to 6.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.