ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   Indianapolis Colts Discussion (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Rivers will start in Seattle. (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=205468)

Racehorse 12-13-2025 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sherck (Post 337846)
Is there anyway to block a poster?

I am at that point with Brylok. He has not added positively to this board in a while.

I do not block regular posters. I only block spammers.

Colts And Orioles 12-13-2025 11:46 PM

o


In 1998, 44 year-old Steve DeBerg had not played in the NFL since 1993, 5 years earlier.

DeBerg decided to give a phone call to Atlanta Falcons head coach Dan Reeves, and inform him that he was intending to make a comeback ...... at which point a flabbergasted Reeves thought that DeBerg was certifiably insane.



Philip Rivers Will Start for Colts ...... And Steve DeBerg Knows the Feeling

(By Sam Farmer)

https://www.latimes.com/sports/story...colts-seahawks

o

albany ed 12-14-2025 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChoppedWood (Post 337797)
To me, this is a state of the Head Coach level decision.

Early this week I voted no to firing Steichen, and I will remain in that camp pending the outcome of tomorrow's game but I reserve the right to change that vote about 8 PM tomorrow evening.

Okay CW, consider yourself placed in the undecided group.

Colts And Orioles 12-14-2025 09:26 PM

o


Prior to the final INT when we were desperately trying to force the ball downfield in the final seconds of the 4th quarter, Philip Rivers' passer rating was 77.8. After that INT, it was 73.1.

Sam Darnold's passer rating for today's game was 84.4.


After starting the game cold going 3-for-8, Rivers went 15-for-19 the rest of the way, including 2 incompletions that were intentional to avoid being sacked.

o

apballin 12-14-2025 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 338209)
o


Prior to the final INT when we were desperately trying to force the ball downfield in the final seconds of the 4th quarter, Philip Rivers' passer rating was 77.8. After that INT, it was 73.1.

Sam Darnold's passer rating for today's game was 84.4.


After starting the game cold going 3-for-8, Rivers went 15-for-19 the rest of the way, including 2 incompletions that were intentional to avoid being sacked.

o

That sounds good, but the fact Abdullah was our leading receiver is a problem

Hoopsdoc 12-14-2025 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 338209)
o


Prior to the final INT when we were desperately trying to force the ball downfield in the final seconds of the 4th quarter, Philip Rivers' passer rating was 77.8. After that INT, it was 73.1.

Sam Darnold's passer rating for today's game was 84.4.


After starting the game cold going 3-for-8, Rivers went 15-for-19 the rest of the way, including 2 incompletions that were intentional to avoid being sacked.

o

18 completions for 120 yards. That ain’t gonna cut it.

Pierce had one catch for 16 yards. He is completely useless with Rivers at quarterback.

Colts And Orioles 12-14-2025 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc (Post 338230)




18 completions for 120 yards. That ain’t gonna cut it.



o


If we were talking about a team that was on it's 1st-string or even 2nd-string quarterback, I would agree ....... this team was on its 4th-string quarterback today ...... and a 4th-string quarterback NEVER cuts it, for ANY team.

If somebody had told any of us before the game that a 4th-string quarterback (or even a 3rd-string quarterback) would throw for 120 yards while not turning the ball over, and settling into a 15-for-19 finish over the final 3 quarters of the game, I don't think that there is an objective football fan in the world that wouldn't take that.

I'm not arguing that Rivers is going to cut it, but that's not the point ...... Daniel Jones and Anthony Richardson were not available, and Riley Leonard has been nursing an injured knee, which may or may not be 100%. Today we didn't have anybody available that was going to cut it. We don't have options that are going to cut it at this point. The gamble for today's game and for the final 3 games of the season is going with either an old, immobile, broken down-but-very savvy and experienced Philip Rivers, or a completely untested 3rd-string QB in Riley Leonard ...... and that gamble is about a 50/50 gamble, maybe 55/45 in favor of Leonard.

o

Hoopsdoc 12-14-2025 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 338233)
o


If we were talking about a team that was on it's 1st-string or even 2nd-string quarterback, I would agree ....... this team is on its 4th string quarterback ...... and a 4th-string quarterback NEVER cuts it, for ANY team.

If somebody had told any of us before the game that a 4th-string quarterback (or even a 3rd-string quarterback) would throw for 120 yards while not turning the ball over, and settling into a 15-for-19 finish over the final 3 quarters of the game, I don't think that there is an objective football fan in the world that wouldn't take that.

I'm not arguing that Rivers is going to cut it, but that's not the point ...... Daniel Jones and Anthony Richardson were not available, and Riley Leonard has been nursing an injured knee. Today we didn't have anybody available that was going to cut it. We don't have options that are going to cut it at this point. The gamble for today's game and for the final 3 games of the season is going with either an old, immobile, broken-down-but very savvy and experienced Philip Rivers, or a completely untested 3rd-string QB in Riley Leonard ...... and that gamble is about a 50/50 gamble.

o

Leonard had no injury designation today. He wasn’t listed on the final injury report.

In other words, he was completely healthy.

He didn’t play because Steichen thought Rivers gave them the best chance to win.

So Rivers wasn’t their 4th string quarterback. He was essentially the third. The guy who had been third was deemed not good enough.

Hoopsdoc 12-14-2025 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 338235)
o


No, we don't know that.

The Colts said that Leonard's knee was hurt right after last week's game, and they said that it was still hurting on Tuesday. Just because they did not announce/designate the injury, doesn't necessarily mean that he was 100%. Teams are not always forthright about injuries, particularly minor injuries. The Colts would have nothing to gain by confirming/announcing that Leonard's knee was still hurt at gametime.

Leonard's knee may have been completely healed today, but we're never going to know that.

o

If a player is dealing with an injury, nfl teams are required to report it on the injury report.

If Leonard was still dealing with an injury and the colts were planning on starting Rivers anyway, there’s no reason they would have risked getting fined by not listing Leonard on the injury report.

That makes no sense.

Leonard was completely healthy for today’s game. To say otherwise makes no sense.

Colts And Orioles 12-14-2025 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc (Post 338234)


He didn’t play because Steichen thought Rivers gave them the best chance to win.



o


Yes, and after the fact, that decision wound up being completely defensible.

Even if Leonard's knee was 100% today, he may or may not have played better than Rivers did today. He may have used his mobility and youth to throw for 250 yards and 2 TD's ...... or, he may have been eaten alive by the Seattle defense, and thrown 3 INT's and fumbled the ball away for a 4th turnover. As I sai9d before, the gamble between the two for today's game was about 50/50.

o

Hoopsdoc 12-14-2025 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 338239)
o


No, that is completely naive. You actually believe that teams never conceal minor injuries ???

There is no way to prove or disprove a minor injury such as a sore knee or a slightly pulled hamstring. What the Colts would have to gain by not designating the injury would be to not let the opponent know about it. If Rivers got hurt today and Leonard had to come in, the Colts would not want the Seahawks to know one way or another whether his knee was sore or not.

o

So you’re saying the colts risked being fined by not reporting Leonard as injured on the off chance that, if RIVERS got injured, it might throw the Seahawks off if Leonard came into the game?

That makes ZERO sense. That’s dumb.

If Leonard were still injured, he would have been on the injury report. There would have been no reason for them to keep him off the injury report.

Hoopsdoc 12-15-2025 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 338243)
o


Yes, I'm saying that. And it's extremely naive for you to think things like that never happen.

And aside from the fact that multi-billionaire owners like the Irsays being fined $25,000, or even $ $50,000 or $100,000 is tantamount to the average American getting exasperated because they lost a dollar bill when they were shopping, there is no way that the league could prove or disprove a players' sore knee.

o

Jesus Christ.

I’m not saying things like that never happen.

I AM saying that there would have been nothing to gain for the Colts by doing that today.

You are saying that Leonard was probably still injured even though not even the Colts were saying that.

You have no basis for that claim.

Leonard wasn’t injured. If he was, the Colts would have said so, first of all because they’re required to, and secondly because it would have given them cover if Rivers completely bombed.

I’m not sure why you’re fixated on this.

Colts And Orioles 12-15-2025 12:29 AM

o


I'll tell you what, Hoops Doc ...... I deleted all of my posts in regard to Leonard's knee. Our debate wasn't worth the trouble, as it's not that important.

I say that's it's possible that Leonard may have still had a score knee that wasn't reported by the team so that the Seahawks would be none the wiser, and you say that you're sure that he was completely healthy ...... no big deal.

o

Hoopsdoc 12-15-2025 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles (Post 338249)
o


I'll tell you what, Hoops Doc ...... I deleted all of my posts in regard to Leonard's knee. Our debate wasn't worth the trouble, as it's not that important.

I say that's it's possible that Leonard may have still had a score knee that wasn't reported by the team so that the Seahawks would be none the wiser, and you say that you're sure that he was completely healthy ...... no big deal.

o

I’m just saying what the team said. And they said Leonard wasn’t injured.

I’ve got no reason to think they were lying.

CletusPyle 12-15-2025 08:47 AM

What is the purpose of Philip Rivers playing another down for the Colts this season? I will probably be accused of being negative, but had the Colts defense played the same way yesterday for Leonard, and the Seahawks offense played as poorly, Leonard would have won that game. That is just my opinion of course, but based on what I saw in the second half at Jacksonville, Leonard would have given us a better chance to win!

The problem is, I doubt our defense would have played as hard for Leonard, we probably would have gotten more rotten calls from the refs, and our OL would not have protected Leonard as well. You should be able to count on the same effort from the D and the O-line, and the refs should call the game the same regardless of the situation, but we all know that just isn't the case!

Unless Riley Leonard is hurt, he should start Monday night, but I'm pretty sure it will be Rivers part 2.

Hoopsdoc 12-15-2025 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CletusPyle (Post 338264)
What is the purpose of Philip Rivers playing another down for the Colts this season? I will probably be accused of being negative, but had the Colts defense played the same way yesterday for Leonard, and the Seahawks offense played as poorly, Leonard would have won that game. That is just my opinion of course, but based on what I saw in the second half at Jacksonville, Leonard would have given us a better chance to win!

The problem is, I doubt our defense would have played as hard for Leonard, we probably would have gotten more rotten calls from the refs, and our OL would not have protected Leonard as well. You should be able to count on the same effort from the D and the O-line, and the refs should call the game the same regardless of the situation, but we all know that just isn't the case!

Unless Riley Leonard is hurt, he should start Monday night, but I'm pretty sure it will be Rivers part 2.

Until they’re completely eliminated from playoff contention, I think Rivers will continue starting. Steichen clearly thinks he gives them the best chance to win.

I think they’ll lose out. Hopefully Leonard will get another shot at some point.

sherck 12-15-2025 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CletusPyle (Post 338264)
What is the purpose of Philip Rivers playing another down for the Colts this season?

I agree 100% with your entire post.

If Leonard had that effort from the offense and defense yesterday, he would have won the game for us. By the end, their entire defense was no more than 10 yards downfield on the snap because OMR could not push it further than that.

We will see but my guess is that CIG gave the ultimatium at the beginning of the season "Playoffs or bust" and Ballard / SS are trying hard to avoid the "bust."

apballin 12-15-2025 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CletusPyle (Post 338264)
What is the purpose of Philip Rivers playing another down for the Colts this season? I will probably be accused of being negative, but had the Colts defense played the same way yesterday for Leonard, and the Seahawks offense played as poorly, Leonard would have won that game. That is just my opinion of course, but based on what I saw in the second half at Jacksonville, Leonard would have given us a better chance to win!

The problem is, I doubt our defense would have played as hard for Leonard, we probably would have gotten more rotten calls from the refs, and our OL would not have protected Leonard as well. You should be able to count on the same effort from the D and the O-line, and the refs should call the game the same regardless of the situation, but we all know that just isn't the case!

Unless Riley Leonard is hurt, he should start Monday night, but I'm pretty sure it will be Rivers part 2.

If they roll Grandpa back out there, and I hate to say this but there’s no way he’s making thru 3 more games. They were looking at his shoulder after halftime and he barely got touched all game.

Put fuckin Leonard in there and let’s fuckin go

Puck 12-15-2025 03:35 PM

Joel A. Erickson
@JoelAErickson
·
12m
Shane Steichen: Philip Rivers will be the starting quarterback against San Francisco.

On Richardson, Steichen says "he's cleared from the eye standpoint, but we're just starting to work him back in physically"

Puck 12-15-2025 05:32 PM

https://x.com/PatMcAfeeShow/status/2...708868500?s=20

Racehorse 12-15-2025 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puck (Post 338339)

The same McAfee that was not renewing his tickets sounds more positive than the majority of fans.

Oldcolt 12-15-2025 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puck (Post 338339)

Stop talking me off the ledge Puck


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.