ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Topics (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Jaff's stupid shit (http://www.coltfreaks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=148736)

JAFF 08-11-2023 06:51 PM

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-ne...-23/index.html

Quote:



In a hearing Friday, US District Judge Tanya Chutkan set the tone for how she will preside over the 2020 election subversion case against former President Donald Trump.

Chutkan kicked off the hearing – the first in the case before her and one that took place in her courtroom at DC federal courthouse – noting that while Trump’s rights as a criminal defendant would be protected, his First Amendment right to free speech was “not absolute.”

The hearing focused on what limits would be placed on how the former president can handle the evidence prosecutors will be turning over to him.

“In a criminal case such as this one, the defendant’s free speech is subject to the rules,” she said.
The judge closed the hearing with a promise that the case would advance like any normal proceeding in the criminal justice system, but warned that the more “inflammatory” statements were made by a party, the quicker she would need to move toward a trial to preserve a fair jury.

“It is a bedrock principle of the judicial process in this country,” she said, while quoting precedent, “that legal trials are not like elections, to be won through the use of the meeting hall, the radio and the newspaper.”

“This case is no exception,” she said.

Over the course of the proceedings, she expressed some skepticism to the arguments made by the office of special counsel Jack Smith, siding with Trump on at least a few matters related to the protective order over evidence that was the subject of Friday’s hearing. Addressing a submission from the government that she refused to let be filed under seal, she also emphasized a need for public transparency into the docket.

The hearing, roughly an hour and 40 minutes long, was the first in the case before Chutkan. She has already shown a habit of responding quickly and tersely on the docket to debates between the parties over scheduling. An Obama appointee and former public defender who has overseen several cases regarding the events of January 6, 2021, Chutkan has been outspoken about the harm the US Capitol attack caused to American democracy.

Chutkan later issued a protective order barring Trump from publicly disclosing sensitive information in the case.

Trump pleaded not guilty to four criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election last week, and the judge cautioned lawyers for Trump, who did not attend the hearing, about any public statements by their client that could possibly intimidate of witnesses.

That is why a judge can limit someones speech.

JAFF 08-11-2023 07:00 PM

The constitutional case that Donald Trump is already banned from being president
 
LOL

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...776702484&ei=7

Quote:


Two conservative legal scholars, members of the Federalist Society in good standing, have just published an audacious argument: that Donald Trump is constitutionally prohibited from running for president, and that state election officials have not only the authority but the legal obligation to prevent his name from appearing on the ballot.

Kroger® Frozen 100% Apple Juice Concentrate 12 Fl Oz
Kroger® Frozen 100% Apple Juice Concentrate 12 Fl Oz
Ad
Kroger
The legal paper, authored by University of Chicago professor William Baude and University of St. Thomas professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, centers on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — a provision that limits people from returning to public office if they have since “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” or “given aid or comfort” to those who have. Baude and Paulsen argue that this clearly covers Trump’s behavior between November 2020 and January 2021.

“The most politically explosive application of Section Three to the events of January 6, is at the same time the most straightforward,” Baude and Paulsen write. “Former President Donald J. Trump is constitutionally disqualified from again being President (or holding any other covered office) because of his role in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 election and the events leading to the January 6 attack.”

The consequences of this argument are astonishing. On Baude and Paulsen’s read, Section 3 is “self-executing” — meaning it does not require an act of Congress to enter force and binds those public officials in the position to act on its dictates. Basically, if a single official anywhere in the US electoral system finds their constitutional analysis compelling, Baude and Paulsen urge them to act on it.

“No official should shrink from these duties. It would be wrong — indeed, arguably itself a breach of one’s constitutional oath of office — to abandon one’s responsibilities of faithful interpretation, application, and enforcement of Section Three,” they write.

As a matter of law, I find their arguments quite compelling. If you look at Section 3 in light of the historical evidence and how restrictions on eligibility for office work elsewhere in the Constitution, it’s hard to disagree with Baude and Paulen’s application of its text to Trump.

But as a matter of politics, encouraging state election officials to go rogue and kick Trump off the ballot is a recipe for disaster. And that disconnect, between what the law says and the practical barriers to implementing it, speaks to some deep problems in American democracy that led to Trump’s insurrection in the first place.

The (very strong) argument that Trump is ineligible for office

Baude and Paulsen’s paper, set to be published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, focusing on plain-language readings on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and the way its key terms were used in political discussion around the time of enactment.

To get what they’re trying to do, it’s worth reading the text of Section 3 in full:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Using historical and dictionary sources, Baude and Paulsen establish clear definitions for key terms. “Insurrection” and “rebellion,” in their view, “cover pretty much the entire terrain of large-scale unlawful resistance to government authority.” To have “engaged in” such conduct, they claim, means being “actively involved in the planning or execution of intentional acts of insurrection or rebellion” or “knowingly provided active, meaningful, voluntary, direct support for, material assistance to, or specific encouragement of such actions.”

If this interpretation is correct, then the legal case against Trump is fairly straightforward — all established by facts in public reporting, evidence from the January 6 committee, and the recent federal indictment.

In this well-known story, Trump was “actively involved” in an extralegal scheme to send fake electors to the Congress, and urged the vice president to unlawfully accept these fake electors over the real ones and crown Trump president. In service of his scheme, he provided “direct support for” and “specific encouragement” of the mob that ransacked the Capitol on January 6 in his speech, his tweets, private statements, and refusal to take actions (like calling in the National Guard) that could have stopped the mob.

“The bottom line is that Donald Trump both ‘engaged in’ ‘insurrection or rebellion’ and gave ‘aid or comfort’ to others engaging in such conduct, within the original meaning of those terms as employed in Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Baude and Paulsen write. “If the public record is accurate, the case is not even close.”

Normally, this kind of argument feels like a purely abstract exercise. Maybe there’s a strong case that Trump running for president is unconstitutional, but who’s actually going to stop him?

The answer, according to Baude and Paulsen, is literally anybody in a legal position to do so.


JAFF 08-11-2023 08:36 PM

GOP: no making them happy
 
House Republicans are furious about Hunter Biden special counsel

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...3dc834f0&ei=15

Quote:


Republicans in Congress railed against Attorney General Merrick Garland's decision to appoint David Weiss as special counsel to oversee the criminal investigation of Hunter Biden.

Special counsels are not required to keep Congress updated on the status of their work, leading to fears that the move would effectively halt congressional probes of the president's son.


House Speaker Kevin McCarthy warned that the special counsel should not be used to "whitewash" the Biden family,

WASHINGTON — After more than two years of demanding that the Justice Department appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden, Republicans in Congress finally got their wish on Friday. And they were furious.

Reactions from the GOP began pouring in within minutes of Attorney General Merrick Garland's announcement on Friday of a special counsel to oversee the criminal investigation of President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden.

"If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn't get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?" House Speaker Kevin McCarthy tweeted shortly after the announcement.

McCarthy said the decision to appoint David Weiss, a federal prosecutor in Delaware who was assigned by former President Donald Trump to lead the criminal investigation into Hunter Biden, "cannot be used to obstruct congressional investigations or whitewash the Biden family corruption."

Special counsels occupy a unique position within the legal system. They traditionally operate outside of the Justice Department's chain of command and the congressional oversight that accompanies it. Special counsels are required to produce final reports on the results of their investigations for the attorney general, but they are not required to keep Congress or the Justice Department updated on the status of their work.

The appointment of the special counsel came as Republicans in Congress ramp up political attacks and investigations of the Biden family ahead of the 2024 election. Republicans argued that a special counsel probe would effectively draw a curtain around evidence they are seeking.

The plea agreement called for Biden to plead guilty to two counts of failing to pay his taxes in return for prosecutors recommending a sentence of probation and the dismissal of a separate gun charge in two years. The deal was scrapped earlier this month after a judge determined the agreements contained "some atypical provisions."

"The fix is in," said a PAC backing former President Donald Trump, Make America Great Again Inc.

"David Weiss cut Hunter Biden an unprecedented plea deal that attempted to give Joe Biden's corrupt son blanket immunity," MAGA Inc. Spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.

"Now, Merrick Garland expects us to trust Weiss to be the Special Counsel that finally brings Hunter Biden to justice," said Leavitt.

A White House spokesperson referred CNBC to the Justice Department, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee jointly looking into the federal probe of the younger Biden's taxes, also accused the DOJ of a "Biden family coverup."

"Let's be clear what today's move is really about," Comer said in a statement. "The Biden Justice Department is trying to stonewall congressional oversight as we have presented evidence to the American people."

A spokesman for Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the House Judiciary Committee chairman who has taken the lead on investigating the federal probe of Hunter Biden, said Weiss "can't be trusted."

"This is just a new way to whitewash the Biden family's corruption," said Russell Dye, a spokesman for Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, the House Judiciary Committee chairman who has taken the lead on investigating the federal probe of Hunter Biden.

Dye said the committee still expects the Justice Department to fully cooperate with Republicans' investigation into Hunter Biden's plea deal, "including not interfering with the 11 transcribed interviews" that have been requested.

Moreover, Weiss' previous offer to appear before the committee this fall is still presumed to be valid, said Dye. As of Friday, the panel had not received anything from DOJ "indicating it is no longer willing to do so."



Lov2fish 08-11-2023 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 270791)
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-ne...-23/index.html



That is why a judge can limit someones speech.

Just cause the fucker says it doesn't make it so.

Lov2fish 08-11-2023 09:20 PM

This has merit and it may but there is law applied first. He has to be convicted of insurrection first. Right now he has the same constitutional protection as anyone pre-trial. Kudos to those guys for actually understanding most of what they read. Right now he is accused of insurrection and not adjudicated.

JAFF 08-11-2023 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lov2fish (Post 270801)
Just cause the fucker says it doesn't make it so.

Perjury is a crime. Not protected by free speech. Slander, while not a crime, is defamation and can lead to a lawsuit, not protected by free speech.

bigalbert 08-12-2023 09:12 AM

So you would agree then that all those Dem congressmen and senators should be charged and muzzled for spewing the hatred against Trump and be held responsible for burning down the cities neighborhoods


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bigalbert 08-12-2023 09:34 AM

We are on dangerous ground. Ultimately what it boils down to is the end game for Satan and his liberal army. Silence the good news.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a36339828a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JAFF 08-12-2023 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigalbert (Post 270823)
So you would agree then that all those Dem congressmen and senators should be charged and muzzled for spewing the hatred against Trump and be held responsible for burning down the cities neighborhoods


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did you miss the part where Trump started a riot to overturn the election?

https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/96639...eachment-trial

Trump is the only person who has called for violence.

omahacolt 08-12-2023 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lov2fish (Post 270769)
Everyone's first amendment rights are absolute. The constitution is absolute, period. The document was created to restrain government from infringing on citizens. It was never for government to grant you shit. People that believe the shit liberal judges spew out are fucking morons and deserve everything that comes their way. The dumbing down of this country is nearly complete.



you have the right to free speech. but there are consequences to what you say.
legally, there are things you aren't allowed to say. you know this. i don't know why this is so hard.

omahacolt 08-12-2023 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigalbert (Post 270825)
We are on dangerous ground. Ultimately what it boils down to is the end game for Satan and his liberal army. Silence the good news.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

you are literally retarded. and acting like you are an actual religious person is hilarious. 100% guarantee jesus would fucking hate you

JAFF 08-12-2023 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 270893)
you have the right to free speech. but there are consequences to what you say.
legally, there are things you aren't allowed to say. you know this. i don't know why this is so hard.

He is not interested in facts and the law.

Lov2fish 08-12-2023 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 270903)
He is not interested in facts and the law.

I know more about law than you ever will, shut up and sit down.

Unless the judge ordered an official gag order (I am not following the case cause I don't give a shit) so not sure if he did or didn't

(. If no gag order is issued than yes he is violating his 1st. amendment rights, like it or not.

(. If a gag order was officially ordered than fuck Trump, let him deal with the fuckup he created.

JAFF 08-12-2023 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lov2fish (Post 270909)
I know more about law than you ever will, shut up and sit down.

Unless the judge ordered an official gag order (I am not following the case cause I don't give a shit) so not sure if he did or didn't

(. If no gag order is issued than yes he is violating his 1st. amendment rights, like it or not.

(. If a gag order was officially ordered than fuck Trump, let him deal with the fuckup he created.

Oh please, there are rules for human interaction.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/07/trum...perts-say.html

Here since you arent paying attention to a national crisis

Lov2fish 08-12-2023 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 270915)
Oh please, there are rules for human interaction.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/07/trum...perts-say.html

Here since you arent paying attention to a national crisis

Your fucking crisis has nothing to do with the constitution. Not one fucking judge sitting right now deserves the privilege to decide what is constitutional and what is not. Stupid fuckers like you, and judges who think they can do whatever they want make me so fucking happy I never took the bar. Dumb asses like you who do not understand one fucking thing about the constitution, and useless judges who only pervert it. Back to my original statement. The dumbing down of this country is reaching the apex of fruition, and it appears you're leading the charge.

JAFF 08-12-2023 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lov2fish (Post 270916)
Your fucking crisis has nothing to do with the constitution. Not one fucking judge sitting right now deserves the privilege to decide what is constitutional and what is not. Stupid fuckers like you, and judges who think they can do whatever they want make me so fucking happy I never took the bar. Dumb asses like you who do not understand one fucking thing about the constitution, and useless judges who only pervert it. Back to my original statement. The dumbing down of this country is reaching the apex of fruition, and it appears you're leading the charge.

Go have a drink, get over yourself

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/07/trum...perts-say.html

bigalbert 08-12-2023 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omahacolt (Post 270894)
you are literally retarded. and acting like you are an actual religious person is hilarious. 100% guarantee jesus would fucking hate you


Actually Jesus would have came to my house. He came for sinners.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bigalbert 08-12-2023 10:10 PM

This is literally election interference


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

bigalbert 08-12-2023 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 270826)
Did you miss the part where Trump started a riot to overturn the election?

https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/96639...eachment-trial

Trump is the only person who has called for violence.


Goodness you live in a bubble. I’ve seen the videos. Do a little googling on Twitter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JAFF 08-13-2023 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigalbert (Post 270936)
Goodness you live in a bubble. I’ve seen the videos. Do a little googling on Twitter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Twitter? Nothing smart happens there.

JAFF 08-13-2023 04:19 AM

Maui fires not just due to climate change but a ‘compound disaster’
 
Quote:

Maui fires not just due to climate change but a ‘compound disaster’
The fires were a textbook case of many different agents acting together

By Scott Dance
August 12, 2023 at 9:47 a.m. EDT

Wildfire devastation outside Lahaina, Hawaii, on Thursday. (Rick Bowmer/AP)

Comment
As scientists weigh the influence climate change may have had in fueling Hawaii’s wildfires, there isn’t one standout factor they point to. Rising temperatures likely contributed to the severity of the blaze in several ways. But global warming could not have driven the fires by itself.
Want to know how your actions can help make a difference for our planet? Sign up for the Climate Coach newsletter, in your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday.

Maui is facing a compound disaster, where many different agents acted together to make the fires so horrific. As human influences on the climate and environment grow, the risk of these disasters is escalating.
Hawaii utility faces scrutiny for not cutting power to reduce fire risks
Recent floods in China, fires in Greece and deadly heat in the Southwest U.S. are other recent examples of how extreme weather, human-caused climate change and changes to the local environment can converge in devastating fashion.


A survivor of the Lahaina, Hawaii wildfire describes how the inferno engulfed homes, as people 'burned alive.' Days later, relief supplies were trickling in. (Video: Zoeann Murphy, Jon Gerberg/The Washington Post)
“If you add together a whole bunch of influences, that’s how you get a disaster,” said Jeff Masters, a meteorologist for Yale Climate Connections. “No one thing makes it happen.”

The links between human-caused climate change and fires are well-established. Global warming means plants can more easily dry out, because warmer air hastens the evaporation of water. As the air sucks more moisture from the land, fire risks are increasing.


Wildfires across Hawaii have killed more than 50 people, displaced hundreds of families and trapped thousands of tourists. These maps show where the wildfires are burning. As blazes continue, follow live updates.
End of carousel
Hawaii is, on average, two degrees warmer than it was in 1950, according to state climate data. Scientists said that likely provides the strongest connection between humans’ fossil fuel consumption, which emits greenhouse gases that warm the planet, and the likelihood of fires in Hawaii and elsewhere.
In photos: The scene as deadly wildfires devastate parts of Hawaii
Rising temperatures have also intensified the heat that has baked the Southwest this summer — and which sent hot, dry air toward Hawaii this week. And climate change is helping to strengthen hurricanes like the one that passed south of the islands this week, probably increasing the strength of winds that fanned the flames.

But scientists have also prominently mentioned the role of non-climate influences in the intensity of the firestorm, such as the introduction of highly combustible nonnative plants, as well as weather patterns that happen naturally.
What we know about the cause of the Maui wildfires
Among factors that made the fire so destructive — severe winds and ongoing drought — the influence of climate change appears indirect, at best.
As wind sent fires spreading out of control Tuesday, many meteorologists pointed out that Hawaii found itself between a strong area of high pressure over the North Pacific and Hurricane Dora, a cyclone that rapidly intensified into a major Category 4 storm. That pressure difference meant Hawaii was in the middle of winds flowing intensely from high pressure to low, gusting over the islands like air being released from a balloon at more than 80 mph in some spots.

A Hawaii Army National Guard Chinook drops buckets of water on wildfires on Maui on Wednesday. (Andrew Jackson/AFP/Getty Images)
Research has shown more tropical cyclones have rapidly intensified in recent decades, and that those rates of intensification have accelerated. Warmer temperatures provide more energy for storms.

But some immediate analyses of the winds observed in Hawaii have found Dora’s presence may have only increased the gusts’ speed by about 5 mph, Masters said. The high pressure — aided by a flow of hot, dry air from the Southwestern U.S. into the Pacific — could have been enough to stir damaging winds on its own.

The hurricane and its intensity were “certainly not the main effect” fueling the fires, Masters said, though its presence could have contributed to the disaster.
After five hours in ocean, Maui fire survivor is ‘blessed to be alive’
As for the drought conditions that covered more than a third of Maui County, where the most destructive fires burned, there is no direct sign that they are the product of climate change, said Abby Frazier, an affiliate faculty member at the University of Hawaii now based at Clark University

While there is a long-term trend of declining precipitation in Hawaii, there isn’t enough evidence to suggest that is the product of anything besides normal climate patterns and fluctuations in the Pacific, she said. Precipitation patterns there are heavily influenced by El Niño, which returned in June, and by a longer-term pattern known as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

El Niño is known for bringing drier winters, but its arrival doesn’t explain the current conditions, Frazier said. In the summer, it can bring more precipitation than normal because of increased tropical cyclone activity, she said.
“We can’t officially say it’s climate change that’s causing all this drying,” Frazier said. “Natural variability is just so strong in Hawaii.”

Smoke blows across the slope of Haleakala volcano on Maui, Hawaii, as a fire burns in Maui's upcountry region on Tuesday. (Matthew Thayer/AP)
That is not to say human activity didn’t directly contribute to the fires in ways that don’t involve the climate.
They are increasingly spreading by burning invasive and fire-prone grasses brought to the islands for ornamental use or for cattle grazing. As agricultural activity has declined on the islands, the grasses have spread across fields that were once regularly watered and maintained, said Alison Nugent, an associate atmospheric scientist at the University of Hawaii’s Water Resources Research Center.

“Over the last few decades those managed agriculture lands have progressively become more and more unmanaged,” Nugent said. “There’s grassland right next to very expensive houses.”
The wildfire risks that introduces demonstrate that “it’s more than climate change,” Masters said. “Humans are messing with the system.”
As long as that continues, he said, “We should expect these sorts of catastrophes to increase.”
These maps show where wildfires are burning in Hawaii
Clay Trauernicht, a fire researcher at the University of Hawaii, said he and others concerned about wildfire risks have for years been working to raise awareness about the importance of better managing the grasses and taking other efforts to harden homes.
He said he hopes the devastation on Maui is enough to spur action so that the fires’ burden isn’t left solely to firefighters.
“We don’t have to be at the mercy of these weather events, but the way we’re operating right now, we are,” Trauernicht said. While climate change is a global problem, the grasses are a local one. “This is a thing we can manage.”
This is a good example of a lot of little things add up. This fire was years in the making.

JAFF 08-14-2023 03:13 PM

Ted Cruz Is Furious Merrick Garland Did Exactly What He Asked in Hunter Biden Case
 
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...nt-camouflage/


Quote:


Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said Sunday he thinks the appointment of special counsel David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware, in the Hunter Biden investigation is “camouflage” and a “cover-up.”
“This appointment is camouflage, and it’s cover-up. I think it’s disgraceful,” Cruz said in an interview with Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo on her show “Sunday Morning Futures.” “Listen, David Weiss was the U.S. attorney hand-picked to lead this investigation, who spent the last five years covering it up. David Weiss, who was personally selected by the two Democrat senators from Delaware, Sens. Tom Carper and Chris Coons.”

Attorney General Merrick Garland announced last week he will be appointing Weiss as special counsel to oversee the investigation into the alleged tax and gun crimes of President Biden’s son, Hunter Biden. The appointment came as a pending plea deal for the president’s son appeared to be falling apart.
“The investigation [into Hunter Biden] has gone nowhere, other than to protect Hunter Biden and Joe Biden,” Cruz said.
Cruz is among numerous Republicans who have criticized the appointment, pointing to claims from two IRS whistleblowers that Weiss was blocked from seeking special counsel status, which both Weiss and the Department of Justice have repeatedly denied.
“They [two IRS whistleblowers] said they’d never seen an investigation like this in their time in law enforcement,” Cruz said, citing the whistleblowers’ claims that Weiss “protected the Biden family.”
California secures settlement with SoCalGas over ‘misleading’ claims that natural gas is ‘renewable’
Reuters clarifies premature report on Georgia Trump indictment
“The result of all that is that David Weiss was either an active participant in covering up this criminality and protecting Joe Biden in engaging in obstruction of justice,” Cruz said. “That’s option one. … Option two, he wasn’t the driver — he was just complicit.”
Cruz went on to call the choice of Weiss as special counsel “wildly inappropriate,” saying that a special counsel should be investigating Garland for whether he lied under oath to Congress when questioned by Cruz. The Texas senator said a special counsel should also investigate uncorroborated allegations of the Biden family’s corruption and bribery while Biden served as vice president.

“That is bribery; it’s not a little gun charge on Hunter,” Cruz said. “It is bribery of the president of the United States, is what these allegations are. And this special counsel, he ain’t going to do anything to get to the bottom of that.”


JAFF 08-16-2023 05:54 AM

The real Trump
 
Trump stiffed his alleged co-conspirators, whose false claims brought in $250 million

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...8b194439&ei=18

Life long grifter.

JAFF 08-17-2023 05:19 PM

Hurricane approaching the WEST coast of Mexico
 
The Gulf Coast is used to storms, the west coast, not so muc

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/17/weath...day/index.html

JAFF 08-17-2023 05:26 PM

Yellowknife, to evacuate
 
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/16/ameri...day/index.html

They dont have enough people to control this fire. Too much square miles and not enough firefighters

JAFF 08-18-2023 10:14 AM

Update 8/18

Looks as if it will make landfall early Friday. It could get as far to the northern boarder of Nevada.

Good news, the ocean gets colder the further it gets north. The good and bad is that California/Nevada/Arizona could get 2-3 years of rain, only its going to happen in 2-3 DAYS. Anyone inland and in low elevation may need to seek higher ground

I want to see the water level of Lake Meade after the storm.

Racehorse 08-18-2023 06:34 PM

The West could use some help to keep fires from having a good run, but hurricanes are a tricky way to get it.

JAFF 08-19-2023 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Racehorse (Post 271465)
The West could use some help to keep fires from having a good run, but hurricanes are a tricky way to get it.

Mudslides are just a byproduct of the drought, all that rain on sleep mountain sides with less foliage. The plants are dead from lack of rain or due to fires.

The region needs the rain, but all at once? One year of rain in 2 days.

JAFF 08-21-2023 07:32 AM

Cherry on top, they just had a minor earthquake

Quote:

SORT BY



25 New Updates
8 hr 41 min ago
Magnitude 5.1 earthquake shakes Southern California
From CNN’s Cheri Mossburg
As Southern California braced for a highly unusual summer storm Sunday afternoon, residents were struck by a much more familiar phenomenon: a magnitude 5.1 earthquake, according to the US Geological Survey.

The epicenter of the quake was in Ojai, between Santa Barbara and Ventura, and it occurred along the Sisar fault, USGS data showed.

There were no immediate reports of damage, the Ventura County Sheriff said in a social media post. County aviation units later reported no damage after flying over the Lake Casitas and Matilija dams and the city of Ojai.

Shaking was felt throughout Los Angeles and surrounding communities, according to a USGS tool that allows residents to self-report their experience.

There were no initial reports of injuries or structural damage in Los Angeles, according to the city's fire department. First responders from all 106 stations are in "earthquake mode," surveying their areas and looking for damage to power lines, transportation infrastructure, apartment buildings and large gathering sites.

About 50 miles away in Valencia, the quake felt like a slow roll, lasting about 20 seconds. Residents reported a slow-rolling effect in the Hollywood area, as well.

At least two aftershocks — measuring 3.1 and 3.6 — followed the initial quake.

Earthquake expert Dr. Lucy Jones said it appears to have been preceded by a small foreshock sequence that began Saturday morning.

USGS seismic reports are preliminary and are sometimes adjusted.

JAFF 08-22-2023 06:18 PM

Trump has yet to help his Georgia co-defendants with their legal bills, a risky test
 
Trump has yet to help his Georgia co-defendants with their legal bills, a risky test of their loyalty


https://www.cnbc.com/2023/08/22/trum...gal-bills.html

JAFF 08-22-2023 07:04 PM

Attorney: Lawyers begging for cash should have "expected" Trump to throw them under t
 
Attorney: Lawyers begging for cash should have "expected" Trump to throw them under the bus

https://www.salon.com/2023/08/22/att...under-the-bus/

JAFF 08-22-2023 07:10 PM

Important information if you travel to georgia
 
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/22/polit...ase/index.html

JAFF 08-23-2023 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 271844)
Attorney: Lawyers begging for cash should have "expected" Trump to throw them under the bus

https://www.salon.com/2023/08/22/att...under-the-bus/


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...f1216ed2&ei=33

JAFF 08-26-2023 03:45 PM

A severe drought is affecting the Panama Canal. That’s not a good sign for supply cha
 
There is no normal

A severe drought is affecting the Panama Canal. That’s not a good sign for supply chains — or your holiday shopping

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/26/econo...ain/index.html

Racehorse 08-26-2023 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 272284)
There is no normal

A severe drought is affecting the Panama Canal. That’s not a good sign for supply chains — or your holiday shopping

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/26/econo...ain/index.html

As if the supply chains were in good shape as it is. I wonder if it will continue to drop, since the ocean levels are allegedly rising. It seems the water from each side would fill in the canal, unless I am missing something.

How far above sea level is the lowest point in the center of the canal?

Racehorse 08-26-2023 05:38 PM

Google is my friend. The canal is an interesting subject to read about.

JAFF 08-26-2023 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Racehorse (Post 272295)
As if the supply chains were in good shape as it is. I wonder if it will continue to drop, since the ocean levels are allegedly rising. It seems the water from each side would fill in the canal, unless I am missing something.

How far above sea level is the lowest point in the center of the canal?

Its the level of the lakes between the oceans. You can let the ocean salt water in, and kill the fish and the plants and create a man made disaster with the lakes along with whatever is going on in the oceans.

Its osmosis, the movement of water across a membrane. Its way ocean fish cant survive in salt water, same with plants. Panama still relies on the lakes for fresh water to drink and fish to eat.

Racehorse 08-27-2023 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JAFF (Post 272304)
Its the level of the lakes between the oceans. You can let the ocean salt water in, and kill the fish and the plants and create a man made disaster with the lakes along with whatever is going on in the oceans.

Its osmosis, the movement of water across a membrane. Its way ocean fish cant survive in salt water, same with plants. Panama still relies on the lakes for fresh water to drink and fish to eat.

Like I said, Google is my friend. I read up on it, but you feel the need to condescend. No wonder people dislike you.

JAFF 08-27-2023 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Racehorse (Post 272332)
Like I said, Google is my friend. I read up on it, but you feel the need to condescend. No wonder people dislike you.

Go look in a mirror, and your original response

JAFF 08-27-2023 03:46 PM

‘Catastrophic’ loss: Huge colonies of emperor penguins saw no chicks survive last yea
 
https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/24/world...ate/index.html

‘Catastrophic’ loss: Huge colonies of emperor penguins saw no chicks survive last year as sea ice disappears


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.