ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-05-2018, 06:30 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,920
Thanks: 17,065
Thanked 4,388 Times in 2,524 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSpaceman View Post
I can even live with the DL, even though I don't like it this way. Its a new DC, new scheme (or back to the old scheme), young players, given them a chance. OK, fine

But you have a QB coming off basically two missed seasons and a near career ending shoulder injury, you can't tell me with that much free agent money you couldn't find SOMEONE to pay, even if you overpay for a few years while you develop someone, to play right tackle.

There is no more time to be patient with the OL. Its been a decade and now two injured all pro level QBs that almost ended their careers over playing behind this OL.
And yet, people still think we should have drafted Chubb over Nelson. Can't have it both ways.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post:
sherck (09-06-2018)
  #12  
Old 09-05-2018, 08:23 AM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
And yet, people still think we should have drafted Chubb over Nelson. Can't have it both ways.
I am fine with having drafted Nelson.

And Its not 'both ways'. One is drafting and one is free agency.

The team sucks and there is cap money to be spent. I don't think its unreasonable to use both means to improve the team

Ballard obviously disagrees based on how he approached the offseason
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DrSpaceman For This Useful Post:
FatDT (09-06-2018)
  #13  
Old 09-05-2018, 02:22 PM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSpaceman View Post
I can even live with the DL, even though I don't like it this way. Its a new DC, new scheme (or back to the old scheme), young players, given them a chance. OK, fine

But you have a QB coming off basically two missed seasons and a near career ending shoulder injury, you can't tell me with that much free agent money you couldn't find SOMEONE to pay, even if you overpay for a few years while you develop someone, to play right tackle.

There is no more time to be patient with the OL. Its been a decade and now two injured all pro level QBs that almost ended their careers over playing behind this OL.
He did pay someone in free agency to play RT, they were just horrible at it. Hopefully that failure will make Ballard second guess his decision to keep scraping up bottom of the barrel free agents.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Maniac For This Useful Post:
sherck (09-06-2018)
  #14  
Old 09-05-2018, 02:49 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 296
Thanked 737 Times in 410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
And yet, people still think we should have drafted Chubb over Nelson. Can't have it both ways.
Through two drafts and two free agent periods (with ample cap available) are you really so naive as to believe taking a guard at 6 was the only way to address the o-line?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
FatDT (09-06-2018)
  #15  
Old 09-05-2018, 04:56 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,059
Thanks: 2,388
Thanked 2,514 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
Through two drafts and two free agent periods (with ample cap available) are you really so naive as to believe taking a guard at 6 was the only way to address the o-line?
Here's the problem. Time is a great thickener of things. This kid could be the next John Hannah. Why wouldn't you want him?

You know why Jacksonville is so good right now? They control both O and D lines of scrimmage. Their QB can't hit his plate with a fork, but they are in the hunt for a Super Bowl.

When the Colts were dominant with Manning, they had a really good line with a very good LT and a great C. Watch where they run on 3 and short. If they run left up this kids butt, and we get first down, maybe it will sell some people.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (09-05-2018), sherck (09-06-2018)
  #16  
Old 09-05-2018, 08:41 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,920
Thanks: 17,065
Thanked 4,388 Times in 2,524 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
Through two drafts and two free agent periods (with ample cap available) are you really so naive as to believe taking a guard at 6 was the only way to address the o-line?
Of course not.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-05-2018, 09:06 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 296
Thanked 737 Times in 410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
Of course not.
Then your “can’t have it both ways” argument isn’t accurate. We could have had it both ways. Only Ballard’s decisions kept the Colts from having both an improved Oline and Chubb (or other defensive starters).
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-05-2018, 09:08 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,920
Thanks: 17,065
Thanked 4,388 Times in 2,524 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
Then your “can’t have it both ways” argument isn’t accurate. We could have had it both ways. Only Ballard’s decisions kept the Colts from having both an improved Oline and Chubb (or other defensive starters).
Surely you aren't so naive as to think that Ballard could have signed any free agent there was this year.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-05-2018, 09:28 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 296
Thanked 737 Times in 410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post

You know why Jacksonville is so good right now? They control both O and D lines of scrimmage. Their QB can't hit his plate with a fork, but they are in the hunt for a Super Bowl.
To me it’s funny you use Jacksonville as your example considering they have been heavy users of free agency - the opposite of Ballard’s approach. They also improved their O-line this offseason by adding an all-pro guard. Didn’t even cost them a top 6 pick.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-05-2018, 09:30 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,102
Thanks: 296
Thanked 737 Times in 410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
Surely you aren't so naive as to think that Ballard could have signed any free agent there was this year.
Not any, no. He also had last years draft and free agency as well. The idea Nelson was the only way to improve the line is ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.