Quentin Nelson permanent left tackle

[jasperhobbs]

It sure would solve a lot of problems if Nelson became the permanent left tackle. Much easier to find a decent guard than a quality left tackle. I would think big Q is athletic enough to play the position. Anyone else agree?

[JAFF]

Originally Posted by jasperhobbs

It sure would solve a lot of problems if Nelson became the permanent left tackle. Much easier to find a decent guard than a quality left tackle. I would think big Q is athletic enough to play the position. Anyone else agree?

Hes the best athlete on the line. They are going to spend huge money to keep him, at either spot, so money isnt an issue.

It will also depend on the draft, free agency, and Castonzo.

[Oldcolt]

I'm good with him playing tackle in a pinch and for a few games. Do not want to move him from guard permanently. One of his best attributes is his incredible instincts in helping out others on the line. We would lose that ability plus he would not pull as effectively from the tackle-he is now the best pulling guard in football.

[rcubed]

Originally Posted by Oldcolt

I'm good with him playing tackle in a pinch and for a few games. Do not want to move him from guard permanently. One of his best attributes is his incredible instincts in helping out others on the line. We would lose that ability plus he would not pull as effectively from the tackle-he is now the best pulling guard in football.

Agree. I would rather find a true LT and keep Q at guard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chaka]

Here’s an older Reddit discussion on the different skills sets and physical attributes needed for guard and tackle. Lots of good stuff, and might explain why although Nelson is an an outstanding guard, he may not be so great at tackle:

http://https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/...kles_in_the_o/

[Racehorse]

Originally Posted by rcubed

Agree. I would rather find a true LT and keep Q at guard.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agree, but his versatility will be helpful going forward.

[Chromeburn]

Originally Posted by jasperhobbs

It sure would solve a lot of problems if Nelson became the permanent left tackle. Much easier to find a decent guard than a quality left tackle. I would think big Q is athletic enough to play the position. Anyone else agree?

I got in an argument on here with someone that he could play LT and perhaps we should play him there. Think it was Omaha.

It easier to find a guard than a tackle. How good could he be at the position? But would we be replacing an all pro guard with an average to good guard. Then perhaps only have an average to good tackle at the position. LTs are usually taller longer and leaner. I think I lean towards trying to draft a replacement.

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by Chromeburn

I got in an argument on here with someone that he could play LT and perhaps we should play him there. Think it was Omaha.

It easier to find a guard than a tackle. How good could he be at the position? But would we be replacing an all pro guard with an average to good guard. Then perhaps only have an average to good tackle at the position. LTs are usually taller longer and leaner. I think I lean towards trying to draft a replacement.

Probably was me. Nelson isn’t your long term solution at tackle imo.

[Chromeburn]

Originally Posted by omahacolt

Probably was me. Nelson isn’t your long term solution at tackle imo.

Nope, I would keep him inside.

[YDFL Commish]

Originally Posted by JAFF

Hes the best athlete on the line. They are going to spend huge money to keep him, at either spot, so money isnt an issue.

It will also depend on the draft, free agency, and Castonzo.

Will peeps stop saying that Q is the best athlete
on the line. It's simply not true.

Braden Smith is the best athlete on the line and his combine numbers prove that out. Hence his seamless
transition from OG to OT.