ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2024, 07:56 PM
Kray007 Kray007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 507
Thanks: 16
Thanked 315 Times in 136 Posts
Default Anyone but Terrion Arnold

I know he’s a popular choice for mock drafters, but I’m not seeing it. As far as I’m concerned, his 4.51 40 time is a big problem. He might be fine in a zone scheme where his lack of deep speed can be covered up; but if we ever make a coaching change and bring in someone who plays more man, he’ll be little more than a speed bump to elite opposing Receivers.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kray007 For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (04-24-2024)
  #2  
Old 04-24-2024, 09:00 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,067
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,657 Times in 958 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kray007 View Post
I know he’s a popular choice for mock drafters, but I’m not seeing it. As far as I’m concerned, his 4.51 40 time is a big problem. He might be fine in a zone scheme where his lack of deep speed can be covered up; but if we ever make a coaching change and bring in someone who plays more man, he’ll be little more than a speed bump to elite opposing Receivers.
Brents ran a 4.5 and the Colts run a zone heavy scheme. Arnold would be fine, if not great.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2024, 11:00 PM
Kray007 Kray007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 507
Thanks: 16
Thanked 315 Times in 136 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Brents ran a 4.5 and the Colts run a zone heavy scheme. Arnold would be fine, if not great.
I’d like to think that, drafting 15th, we’ll have a chance to find someone better than Brents. I’d like to find a scheme versatile Corner, someone who can both play zone and shut down an elite Receiver If he has to.

I’m tired of watching Cornerbacks whose skill set mostly revolves around giving a ten yard cushion. I’m tired of letting opponents complete 80 percent of their completions. I’m tired of making rookie journeyman Quarterbacks look like the second coming of Joe Montana. I’m tired of ancient, mediocre, vanilla zone defenses that opponents have had a quarter century to solve.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-25-2024, 12:48 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,067
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,657 Times in 958 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kray007 View Post
I’d like to think that, drafting 15th, we’ll have a chance to find someone better than Brents. I’d like to find a scheme versatile Corner, someone who can both play zone and shut down an elite Receiver If he has to.

I’m tired of watching Cornerbacks whose skill set mostly revolves around giving a ten yard cushion. I’m tired of letting opponents complete 80 percent of their completions. I’m tired of making rookie journeyman Quarterbacks look like the second coming of Joe Montana. I’m tired of ancient, mediocre, vanilla zone defenses that opponents have had a quarter century to solve.
I like Quinyon Mitchell better as well, but I'm not going to burn it to the ground if they draft Arnold. Arnold's 10 split was still elite, and he had great explosion and COD numbers, meaning your worries about 10 yard cushions are unwarranted.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2024, 06:14 PM
Kray007 Kray007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 507
Thanks: 16
Thanked 315 Times in 136 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I like Quinyon Mitchell better as well, but I'm not going to burn it to the ground if they draft Arnold. Arnold's 10 split was still elite, and he had great explosion and COD numbers, meaning your worries about 10 yard cushions are unwarranted.
The problem is that he’s not big enough or strong enough to jam Receivers at the line. He might well excel at covering crossing patterns and underneath routes; but, he just doesn’t have the top end speed to cover elite receivers on deep patterns. Right now, sure, the Colts employ a zone scheme. But, if Gus Bradley’s D lays another egg in 2024, he’s probably gone.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kray007 For This Useful Post:
YDFL Commish (04-25-2024)
  #6  
Old 04-25-2024, 06:53 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,067
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,657 Times in 958 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kray007 View Post
The problem is that he’s not big enough or strong enough to jam Receivers at the line. He might well excel at covering crossing patterns and underneath routes; but, he just doesn’t have the top end speed to cover elite receivers on deep patterns. Right now, sure, the Colts employ a zone scheme. But, if Gus Bradley’s D lays another egg in 2024, he’s probably gone.
We should be concerned right now with what makes the 2024 Colts the best. If the FO determines that's Arnold, I'm good with that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2024, 06:55 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,435
Thanks: 2,049
Thanked 2,268 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kray007 View Post
The problem is that he’s not big enough or strong enough to jam Receivers at the line. He might well excel at covering crossing patterns and underneath routes; but, he just doesn’t have the top end speed to cover elite receivers on deep patterns. Right now, sure, the Colts employ a zone scheme. But, if Gus Bradley’s D lays another egg in 2024, he’s probably gone.
Agree on Bradley. Give him defenders, so that he has no excuses.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-25-2024, 07:00 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,241
Thanks: 1,466
Thanked 4,297 Times in 1,758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kray007 View Post
I know he’s a popular choice for mock drafters, but I’m not seeing it. As far as I’m concerned, his 4.51 40 time is a big problem. He might be fine in a zone scheme where his lack of deep speed can be covered up; but if we ever make a coaching change and bring in someone who plays more man, he’ll be little more than a speed bump to elite opposing Receivers.
dam Jr 40 time scouting
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-25-2024, 07:03 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,435
Thanks: 2,049
Thanked 2,268 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default

I wouldn't hate an Arnold pick. but, I would damn well hate a trade back for a Kool-Aid pick.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-25-2024, 07:55 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,159
Thanks: 1,295
Thanked 1,337 Times in 754 Posts
Default

I would be shocked if both Mitchell and DeJean weren't higher on Ballard's draft board than Arnold. Both are bigger, faster, and have a higher RAS score than Arnold.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.