ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2018, 07:06 AM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,758
Thanks: 1,830
Thanked 1,206 Times in 531 Posts
Default NFL.com article on predicted wins

Using some math model that uses a WHOLE lot more data than I thought was recorded in any one database (located here).

The Colts?

Quote:
#19 COLTS: 7.4 wins
Current record: 3-5. Projected playoff percentage: 27.3.

The Colts have the league's best third-down offense, converting 52.2 percent of the time on this crucial down. One of the main drivers of their success here -- and when it comes to wins -- is the improved ability of the O-line to keep Andrew Luck upright. Luck has only been sacked 10 times in eight games and is posting the lowest sack average in the league (1.25 sacks per game). Some of this is because of Luck's excellent decision-making, but also note that over the past three games, Luck has been sacked exactly zero times.
Seems about right; 4 or 5 wins out of our last 8 games. That is about the team we are right now.

I would LOVE for us to win more than that but am resigned to a 7 or 8 win season at this point.

Walk Worthy,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post:
Chaka (11-01-2018), Indiana V2 (11-02-2018), Pez (11-01-2018), VeveJones007 (11-01-2018)
  #2  
Old 11-01-2018, 11:58 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,242
Thanks: 1,465
Thanked 4,290 Times in 1,758 Posts
Default

Looks right to me.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
Pez (11-01-2018)
  #3  
Old 11-01-2018, 12:41 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Yep. You don't need a fancy model to know that a +18 point differential over 8 games translates to roughly a 4-4 record. You extrapolate that to the remaining 8 games and you expect about 4 more wins.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2018, 12:52 PM
1965southpaw's Avatar
1965southpaw 1965southpaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 997
Thanks: 548
Thanked 818 Times in 391 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Yep. You don't need a fancy model to know that a +18 point differential over 8 games translates to roughly a 4-4 record. You extrapolate that to the remaining 8 games and you expect about 4 more wins.
Lol....I used an even simpler math model to predict 8 wins before the season began......

Take 2017 wins (4) and replace the most clueless HC ever with a talented QB (2x force multiplier because both coaching and talent matter) = 8 wins
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2018, 01:16 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1965southpaw View Post
Lol....I used an even simpler math model to predict 8 wins before the season began......

Take 2017 wins (4) and replace the most clueless HC ever with a talented QB (2x force multiplier because both coaching and talent matter) = 8 wins
My way is less controversial on this site.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2018, 02:29 PM
1965southpaw's Avatar
1965southpaw 1965southpaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 997
Thanks: 548
Thanked 818 Times in 391 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
My way is less controversial on this site.
If you aren't pissing someone off, you aren't trying hard enough.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 1965southpaw For This Useful Post:
Indiana V2 (11-02-2018)
  #7  
Old 11-01-2018, 04:01 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

I said 7 wins in preseason and this seems about on par w/that.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2018, 04:38 PM
Chaka's Avatar
Chaka Chaka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 858
Thanks: 336
Thanked 666 Times in 285 Posts
Default

Four more wins sounds fairly reasonable, though I think (and hope) we could do a little better than that. Should have had a better first half record. The Texans loss might be one that people find fault with, but a tie wouldn't have improved our playoff prospects all that much. Still glad we went for the win instead, even if it didn't work.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chaka For This Useful Post:
Pez (11-01-2018)
  #9  
Old 11-01-2018, 04:50 PM
Pez Pez is offline
Accidental Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,576
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 685 Times in 374 Posts
Default

On the day of the game I was pissed about going for it, it took me a couple days to understand that (at last in a way), Ballard was making a statement about the culture he is trying to install in this team. Play to win. There's even logic behind it, it was 4th and 2 I think, and we are over 50% conversion rate on 3rd down... go for it.

I think 5 wins down the stretch is reasonable. If we get a little help from Houston we can be in the hunt for the division, or if Houston runs away with it we might be in the hunt for an AFC wildcard.

Feels like 8-8 to me, missing the playoffs and on very solid footing for next year.
__________________
** 2017 Premier league champion **

"I want to dominate all my opponents, and take their will away to play the game, by each play, and finishing them past the whistle."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-01-2018, 04:51 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,514 Times in 1,414 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
Using some math model that uses a WHOLE lot more data than I thought was recorded in any one database (located here).

The Colts?



Seems about right; 4 or 5 wins out of our last 8 games. That is about the team we are right now.

I would LOVE for us to win more than that but am resigned to a 7 or 8 win season at this point.

Walk Worthy,
I think the O line play has been a vast improvement over last year. And since Costanzo has returned, WOW.

But I would inject this one item. Scheme. The O line has a better chance of keeping Luck clean when the D just can't pin it's ears back and come full speed on the snap.

The Jags game in Indy last year, when there was NOTHING to stop the Jags from bringing 7 guys on a blitz was ghastly to watch. That won't happen this year. Opposing teams can't overpower the O line, because Luck will have options. It's the scheme. ITS COACHING.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
daedge (11-01-2018), Racehorse (11-01-2018)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.