#101
|
||||
|
||||
Does not fit his narrative.
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
It was 2012, they just cut half the roster and had about half the cap in penalties (that last part may be exaggerated slightly, but a good chunk of that team's cap figure was penalties). They weren't expecting to compete and they needed someone to play safety. He was a body that they likely were looking to replace immediately. If you expect every single player the team signs or drafts to be successful, you're going to be disappointed.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post: | ||
apballin (09-15-2017) |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
What narrative? That looking at the facts and circumstances behind an outcome is important? Because that's all I've been doing here.
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
The stop sign puts up a better argument.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post: | ||
#105
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Holy shit two face |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Your criticism lacks merit. Pagano isn't in talent acquisition, so the only thing we could really be talking about with Zbikowski in relation to Pagano is his development, or lack thereof. That said, they have a saying in the analytical world for this sort of thing: garbage in, garbage out.
|
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#109
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Why are you all so obsessed with Zbikowski? He was a bad player who they knew was bad and sought to replace as soon as possible. He was also necessary because they needed a body.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|