ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-02-2018, 11:10 AM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,751
Thanks: 1,793
Thanked 1,195 Times in 527 Posts
Default NFL Free Cap Space

Hey Freaks,

I don't normally troll through the other team's cap situations but i decided that since the last phase of the off-season talent acquisition phase is upon us (Cap Cut Free Agent Phase), that I would give an update on who had free cap space and who was in trouble.

These numbers below will not match anyone else's numbers because I factor in a few things that most cap guys don't at this time of the season:

1. Draft class projected cost
2. Players #52/53 on roster (only need to count 51 players during the off-season)
3. Practice Squad cost
4. $3m in "churn" space for the season that allows you to sign minimum pay guys from your practice squad to your active roster during the seasont ot replace players going onto IR.

So, the number below has all those factored in so it is a dollar amount that could be spent on NEW contracts to acquire new players (or used to re-sign / extend current players, etc).

01. $46.5m = CLE
02. $45.3m = IND
03. $27.5m = TEN
04. $22.6m = SF
05. $22.3m = HOU
06. $17.2m = CHI
07. $10.4m = NYJ
08. $08.1m = MIN
09. $06.7m = ARI
10. $05.7m = CIN
11. $05.6m = WAS
12. $04.9m = JAX
13. $04.8m = BUF
14. $02.1m = LAC
15. $00.3m = KC
16. $00.2m = NE

Half the league can sign all the players currently on their roster and pay for all of the in-season costs that are upcoming.

However, that also means that HALF of the league will be cutting veterans or restructuring veterans on their roster in order to meet their cap obligations once the 2018 season starts (i.e. cut down to 53 players and sign practice squad).

And the Colts are one of the two teams with a lot of cap space to use on an unexpected cap cut whom can help us out.

The roster is not set yet, Colts fans. Sure, it is probably 90% set but there may still be 3 or 4 new faces on our 53 man roster whom can fill those holes that still remain (3-tech DT, LB, CB2).

Walk Worthy,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!

Last edited by sherck; 05-04-2018 at 06:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post:
Butter (05-04-2018), Pez (05-03-2018), Racehorse (05-03-2018), Spike (05-04-2018)
  #2  
Old 05-02-2018, 11:27 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
Hey Freaks,

I don't normally troll through the other team's cap situations but i decided that since the last phase of the off-season talent acquisition phase is upon us (Cap Cut Free Agent Phase), that I would give an update on who had free cap space and who was in trouble.

These numbers below will not match anyone else's numbers because I factor in a few things that most cap guys don't at this time of the season:

1. Draft class projected cost
2. Players #52/53 on roster (only need to count 51 players during the off-season)
3. Practice Squad cost
4. $3m in "churn" space for the season that allows you to sign minimum pay guys from your practice squad to your active roster during the seasont ot replace players going onto IR.

So, the number below has all those factored in so it is a dollar amount that could be spent on NEW contracts to acquire new players (or used to re-sign / extend current players, etc).

01. $46.5m = NYJ
02. $45.3m = IND
03. $27.5m = TEN
04. $22.6m = SF
05. $22.3m = HOU
06. $17.2m = CHI
07. $10.4m = NYJ
08. $08.1m = MIN
09. $06.7m = ARI
10. $05.7m = CIN
11. $05.6m = WAS
12. $04.9m = JAX
13. $04.8m = BUF
14. $02.1m = LAC
15. $00.3m = KC
16. $00.2m = NE

Half the league can sign all the players currently on their roster and pay for all of the in-season costs that are upcoming.

However, that also means that HALF of the league will be cutting veterans or restructuring veterans on their roster in order to meet their cap obligations once the 2018 season starts (i.e. cut down to 53 players and sign practice squad).

And the Colts are one of the two teams with a lot of cap space to use on an unexpected cap cut whom can help us out.

The roster is not set yet, Colts fans. Sure, it is probably 90% set but there may still be 3 or 4 new faces on our 53 man roster whom can fill those holes that still remain (3-tech DT, LB, CB2).

Walk Worthy,
I could see Ballard exploring stop-gap veterans for these spots, but I don't think it's a high priority for him.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2018, 12:18 PM
Colt Classic Colt Classic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,681
Thanks: 200
Thanked 448 Times in 282 Posts
Default

Yup, he's Norman Dale at this point of the offseason. His team is on the <field>.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Colt Classic For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (05-03-2018)
  #4  
Old 05-02-2018, 12:19 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

I could see a LB or maybe DT if the right guy comes available, but I think Desir is your CB2 in 2018.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2018, 12:36 PM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,751
Thanks: 1,793
Thanked 1,195 Times in 527 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
I could see a LB or maybe DT if the right guy comes available, but I think Desir is your CB2 in 2018.
Perfer Kenny Moore over Desir. It feels to me like the younger kid progressed during the season a lot further than Desir did.

Of course, perhaps that is just because Desir had a higher floor being a veteran.

Our defense is going to be no more than league average at best this season. Hopefully, a top 5 offense will be able to pull them along.

Walk Worthy,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2018, 12:45 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
Perfer Kenny Moore over Desir. It feels to me like the younger kid progressed during the season a lot further than Desir did.

Of course, perhaps that is just because Desir had a higher floor being a veteran.

Our defense is going to be no more than league average at best this season. Hopefully, a top 5 offense will be able to pull them along.

Walk Worthy,
Keep in mind that the corners are going to be asked to do very different things in this new defense. I think Desir's size will win out at CB2. He has 5 inches on Moore.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
Puck (05-02-2018)
  #7  
Old 05-02-2018, 01:30 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,395
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 2,225 Times in 1,200 Posts
Default

I actually think Moore might be better as a zone CB than he was playing man.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2018, 02:03 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,024
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,613 Times in 938 Posts
Default

Wilson and Hairston are likely #1 and #2 at CB.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2018, 02:17 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 7,930
Thanks: 1,780
Thanked 2,852 Times in 1,401 Posts
Default

One of Dam's favorites will be available next yr. Broncos not picking up 5th yr option on Shane Ray

Not sure if he fits what were are going to be doing, but maybe Ballard can make a trade and get him now and work out a contract

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...ne-rays-option
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-02-2018, 05:31 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,024
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,613 Times in 938 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
One of Dam's favorites will be available next yr. Broncos not picking up 5th yr option on Shane Ray

Not sure if he fits what were are going to be doing, but maybe Ballard can make a trade and get him now and work out a contract

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...ne-rays-option
Might be a good flyer, had 8 sacks in 2016 before injuries took him out for most of 2017. It makes zero sense for the Broncos to keep him, however, with two top 5 picks as bookend pass rushers.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.