#161
|
||||
|
||||
You are a fool, Nelson was Ballards choice regardless of if Chubb was there ... great pick
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
#162
|
||||
|
||||
Do you hate Ballard as much as you hated Grigson now?
|
#163
|
||||
|
||||
When cle took ward I thought Chubb was ours
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post: | ||
Puck (04-26-2018), VeveJones007 (04-26-2018) |
#164
|
||||
|
||||
As fast as Colts picked, Nelson was Ballards choice all along, even if Chubb was there ... IMHO
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
#165
|
||||
|
||||
Christ man come off it. It is ok to like a pick over another without being a total dumbass. I appreciate a lot of your statistical analysis, stop being a douche. It is ok to disagree man.
|
#166
|
|||
|
|||
The Colts have no linebackers and no pass rush. They had two potential generational talents at LB staring them in the face and at least one team looking to trade up for a QB. While I wouldn't have been thrilled with 12, 53, and 56, Edmunds and two more second round picks would've been vastly superior to Nelson. Now, the only potential game changing defensive talent I see on the board is Rasheem Green and Harold Landry, and there isn't a LB worth taking until Day 3. Hopefully someday this franchise will learn that defense wins championships. Clearly they haven't yet.
|
#167
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post: | ||
Coltsfever (06-19-2019), Maniac (04-27-2018) |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#169
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post: | ||
Dam8610 (04-27-2018) |
#170
|
|||
|
|||
Or, you know, use that 2nd rounder on a defender as well and find your starting OGs on Day 3 like most good teams do.
|
|
|