#11
|
||||
|
||||
I would scream at my TV for minutes on end, and complain ceaselessly to everyone I know including my mother who knows nothing about football.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to natagu23 For This Useful Post: | ||
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Malik Hooker. He'll be gone before 15, but if not? If Mixon is still there in round 2, I'd take him, but not in Round 1.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Mixon losing control worries me. You have to cross a threshold in your head to hit a woman like that. At least I do. Even if he is ok, the negative press that will inevitably accompany him will be a headache, especially for a rookie GM. You need to be in the right market to draft Mixon. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Well those are good blood lines. But TJ has great tape and he is still learning the position. He was all over the field against LSU. I don't see him as a pure EDGE though. More a strong side with the ability to set the edge and also rush the passer. He is perfect in a 3-4.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
McCaffrey will be good, but he needs to play in the right system. Surprised the pats traded down, he would be perfect there. He is not a bell call back where he can run it inside for 20 plays a game.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That would kinda suck because he would fit that system perfectly. I would sh*t my pants a little. Just a little slippage |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
I agree.....lol, I think he's going to be good but he would not be helping what the Colts need most which is defense - defense and defense.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I know the Colts are in bad need of defensive improvement, but if they can generate a consistent running game, the offense would stay on the field longer. This too would improve the defense. Within the first 3 rounds, I'd like to see them get a quality running back.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
He would tear it up in that pats system. I had him slotted there till they traded down. He will give secondaries fits for years if he can get a accurate QB to throw to him. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think we would use him correctly. Not really what we want in a RB.
|
|
|