ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-06-2018, 03:27 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coltsalr View Post
True, McDaniels has only proven himself capable of having a spectacular offense when he has a great QB. I have no doubt that he’d falter, just as he has in the past, with a lame QB, much like Brian Billick.

Luckily, he’d have a great QB in Indy.

I say this, not sarcastically, because we have indeed had idiot OC’s that have proven themselves incapable of having great offenses with a great QB. McDaniels at least wouldn’t squander our QB talent.
I worry about how long it would take to get the offense built the way that McDaniels would want; although, it isn't terribly different from what the offense needs anyway. If they were to do it, now is a good time. They need:

-Multiple underneath WR options
-Receiving back
-Upgrade at TE
-3 OL

Sure, they have the QB (assuming health), but that's a 2-3 year build needed on offense.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-06-2018, 03:31 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gimmick View Post
I have no problem with hiring a ST coach, God knows our return units have been worst of all time for 20 years.

But I challenge anyone to find me a SB winning coach who didn't start until he was AARP or getting ready to collect social security. He's probably just a good assistant and nothing more.
Winning a Super Bowl is too small a criteria. How about Bruce Arians?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-06-2018, 03:49 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,930
Thanks: 17,133
Thanked 4,404 Times in 2,531 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
I worry about how long it would take to get the offense built the way that McDaniels would want; although, it isn't terribly different from what the offense needs anyway. If they were to do it, now is a good time. They need:

-Multiple underneath WR options
-Receiving back
-Upgrade at TE
-3 OL

Sure, they have the QB (assuming health), but that's a 2-3 year build needed on offense.
Not sure all of that is true. The line would look better with quicker reads. TY and Rogers could do the underneath stuff quite well, if allowed. Heck, Donte could, if retained for a new contract. Doyle can catch as well as most TEs. If you want a Gronk, then you will be disappointed. There is just one of those.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-06-2018, 03:51 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
and you would get more patriots to root for
Our track record on former Pats that I’ve been excited to acquire (Butler, Sheard, Brissett, Sergio Brown, etc) has been pretty good.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-06-2018, 03:54 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
I worry about how long it would take to get the offense built the way that McDaniels would want; although, it isn't terribly different from what the offense needs anyway. If they were to do it, now is a good time. They need:

-Multiple underneath WR options
-Receiving back
-Upgrade at TE
-3 OL

Sure, they have the QB (assuming health), but that's a 2-3 year build needed on offense.
McDaniels has made it work in spite of rotating personnel, particularly along the OL in NE.

That said, I do agree that for his quick hitting offense that we’d need to start changing the WR corps to getting smart WR’s that can read coverages and get open underneath as opposed to the world-class speed burner deep threats that Grigson had such a fetish for.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-06-2018, 03:57 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
Not sure all of that is true. The line would look better with quicker reads. TY and Rogers could do the underneath stuff quite well, if allowed. Heck, Donte could, if retained for a new contract. Doyle can catch as well as most TEs. If you want a Gronk, then you will be disappointed. There is just one of those.
Well, I do doubt that Ballard’s former team would be willing to trade us Kelce.

That said, Jimmy Graham is supposed to be let go by Seattle this offseason. He could fit the bill on doing some of the deep seam and red zone routes that McDaniels likes to run with Gronk.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-06-2018, 04:21 PM
Dewey 5 Dewey 5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,826
Thanks: 2,652
Thanked 1,121 Times in 624 Posts
Default

McDaniels is the guy I really want to get the job but I don't think he will take the job if Ballard offers it to him.I think he will go the Giants or Titans when they lose today & Mularkey gets fired.

Next up for me would be Matt Nagy & I wouldn't hesitate for one minute.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-06-2018, 05:01 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,241
Thanks: 1,464
Thanked 4,293 Times in 1,758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coltsalr View Post
Our track record on former Pats that I’ve been excited to acquire (Butler, Sheard, Brissett, Sergio Brown, etc) has been pretty good.
you have wanted every single patriot that has been released or traded or not signed by the pats.


it would be an easier list to ask what former pats players didn't you want?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
Puck (01-06-2018)
  #39  
Old 01-06-2018, 05:05 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
you have wanted every single patriot that has been released or traded or not signed by the pats.


it would be an easier list to ask what former pats players didn't you want?
And you were a cheerleader for every guy that Grigson did bring in.

It would be easier to come up with a list to come up with guys that Grigson brought in that didn’t actually suck.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-06-2018, 07:52 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 7,930
Thanks: 1,782
Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,402 Posts
Default

Toub isn't even scheduled for an interview with the Colts unless I mossed something
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.