#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
-Multiple underneath WR options -Receiving back -Upgrade at TE -3 OL Sure, they have the QB (assuming health), but that's a 2-3 year build needed on offense. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Our track record on former Pats that I’ve been excited to acquire (Butler, Sheard, Brissett, Sergio Brown, etc) has been pretty good.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That said, I do agree that for his quick hitting offense that we’d need to start changing the WR corps to getting smart WR’s that can read coverages and get open underneath as opposed to the world-class speed burner deep threats that Grigson had such a fetish for. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That said, Jimmy Graham is supposed to be let go by Seattle this offseason. He could fit the bill on doing some of the deep seam and red zone routes that McDaniels likes to run with Gronk. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
McDaniels is the guy I really want to get the job but I don't think he will take the job if Ballard offers it to him.I think he will go the Giants or Titans when they lose today & Mularkey gets fired.
Next up for me would be Matt Nagy & I wouldn't hesitate for one minute. |
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
it would be an easier list to ask what former pats players didn't you want? |
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post: | ||
Puck (01-06-2018) |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It would be easier to come up with a list to come up with guys that Grigson brought in that didn’t actually suck. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Toub isn't even scheduled for an interview with the Colts unless I mossed something
__________________
Gonna win it all. |
|
|