ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-14-2019, 03:59 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 1,629
Thanks: 737
Thanked 706 Times in 370 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty46953 View Post
McCoy's release would save the Bucs $13 million against the cap this year. If anything wait to see if Bucs release him. I don't see Ballard sending a pick and a player for the 31 year old McCoy who is under contract through 2021;
2019: $13 million
2020: $10 million (+ $2.5 million / Roster Bonus)
2021: $10,432,253 (+ $2.5 million / Roster Bonus)
Based on that contract, I agree. Wait and see if he's released.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-14-2019, 05:18 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 876
Thanks: 362
Thanked 345 Times in 197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
You use the metrics to determine what natural advantages a given player has that would make making plays easier for them, then you compare that to the tape. More data is better in any predictive analysis exercise.
It is the eye test. Did he make a play? Tackle, sack, pressure?

Don't be a dumb@ss. The player either makes plays or he doesn't
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
YDFL Commish (04-14-2019)
  #13  
Old 04-14-2019, 06:33 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,588
Thanks: 706
Thanked 1,837 Times in 836 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
You use the metrics to determine what natural advantages a given player has that would make making plays easier for them, then you compare that to the tape. More data is better in any predictive analysis exercise.
Shut up
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-14-2019, 06:33 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,588
Thanks: 706
Thanked 1,837 Times in 836 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
For a low pick maybe. But if Ballard is at all interested I expect he’d wait for McCoy to be released.
Yep. This is the only way it makes sense to kick the tires
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-15-2019, 12:34 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 456
Thanked 689 Times in 422 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
With the premium this system places on length for DL, I doubt Saunders is a target. Plus I don't think Eberflus wants any DL over 300 pounds, and Saunders main selling point is his athleticism at 320. It's the same reason I doubt Dexter Lawrence is a target, and I think the Colts likely value Tillery higher and Wilkins lower than the general scouting community.
I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss him. Players can lose weight and he was very disruptive at the senior bowl. Ballard likes his athletes and senior bowl performers. Also I dismissed a lot of mocks that had us taking Lawrence, but we are currently down a NT and Lawrence isn’t your typical NT plodder. He has a higher RAS score than Tillery and is only a few hundredths behind Q Williams. He might be a three down player, I wonder what he would look like if he lost some weight. It is not often a guy that size, who can move so well, comes along. Tillery and Wren also have high scores, I could see those two getting picked with their length in mind.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-15-2019, 12:41 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,217
Thanks: 302
Thanked 1,054 Times in 477 Posts
Default

If Dexter Lawrence is the next Haloti Ngata, then yeah let's draft him. If he's the next Snacks Harrison, he'll be valuable but I don't want to spend a 1st on him.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-15-2019, 03:08 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,969
Thanks: 58
Thanked 545 Times in 336 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss him. Players can lose weight and he was very disruptive at the senior bowl. Ballard likes his athletes and senior bowl performers. Also I dismissed a lot of mocks that had us taking Lawrence, but we are currently down a NT and Lawrence isn’t your typical NT plodder. He has a higher RAS score than Tillery and is only a few hundredths behind Q Williams. He might be a three down player, I wonder what he would look like if he lost some weight. It is not often a guy that size, who can move so well, comes along. Tillery and Wren also have high scores, I could see those two getting picked with their length in mind.
Lawrence got popped for PEDs and would have to lose about 40 pounds to be in line with what the Colts want is a DL. He may have the requisite length, though. Saunders has very short arms as I recall.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-15-2019, 05:01 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,468
Thanks: 456
Thanked 689 Times in 422 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
If Dexter Lawrence is the next Haloti Ngata, then yeah let's draft him. If he's the next Snacks Harrison, he'll be valuable but I don't want to spend a 1st on him.
I was pretty shocked to see his score. Not many people that size that has that athletiscm.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-15-2019, 05:28 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 876
Thanks: 362
Thanked 345 Times in 197 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Lawrence got popped for PEDs and would have to lose about 40 pounds to be in line with what the Colts want is a DL. He may have the requisite length, though. Saunders has very short arms as I recall.
Short arms? What he can't do push ups? He can't reach his wanker? WTF does it mean to have short arms???
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-15-2019, 08:16 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 5,991
Thanks: 778
Thanked 979 Times in 524 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
Short arms? What he can't do push ups? He can't reach his wanker? WTF does it mean to have short arms???
Jaff. Seriously. You do understand the difference here right? Maybe I missed the sarcasm and if I did I apologize.

But all of this stuff makes a difference on the NFL level. This is notFriday night HS football

Measurable safe a REAL THING JSYK
__________________
If you're not a Freak then you're just on the bandwagon
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Puck For This Useful Post:
Dewey 5 (04-15-2019)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.