ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #481  
Old 04-19-2018, 11:39 AM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Puck are you seriously saying Cleveland won't pick a QB with either of their picks?
Reply With Quote
  #482  
Old 04-19-2018, 11:40 AM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,132
Thanks: 933
Thanked 1,476 Times in 814 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
Dam if you were a Cleveland fan you would still want Chubb.

I think Cleveland goes Barkley with their 1st and Chubb at 4 if th Giants dont pick him.

Chubb wont be there at 6. If Ballard was all in on Chubb he wouldnt have traded out of 3.

He knows there are more needs than just one player.

If Chubb is on the board and he gets an offer to move down and pick up a couple of 1st (Buffalo) and 2nd and a 3rd in the process He will do it. It's the smart thing to do.

No one player in this draft is going to change this team. But multiple 1st 2nd and 3rd rounders will.
no way. CLE cant fuck around with the QB spot any longer. They got a competent GM now and will take QB 1 and hope barkley is there at 4.
Reply With Quote
  #483  
Old 04-19-2018, 11:41 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
Puck are you seriously saying Cleveland won't pick a QB with either of their picks?
I'm hoping he meant "Darnold" and just mistakenly typed "Barkley."

In fact, the Ringer is reporting that the Browns have considered taking two QBs early (not necessarily #1 and #4, but #1 and maybe a 2).
Reply With Quote
  #484  
Old 04-19-2018, 12:52 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5,995
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,595 Times in 925 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
Dam if you were a Cleveland fan you would still want Chubb.

I think Cleveland goes Barkley with their 1st and Chubb at 4 if th Giants dont pick him.

Chubb wont be there at 6. If Ballard was all in on Chubb he wouldnt have traded out of 3.

He knows there are more needs than just one player.

If Chubb is on the board and he gets an offer to move down and pick up a couple of 1st (Buffalo) and 2nd and a 3rd in the process He will do it. It's the smart thing to do.

No one player in this draft is going to change this team. But multiple 1st 2nd and 3rd rounders will.
What does what I want or would hypothetically want have to do with it? Cleveland NEEDS a QB and will take one at 1 unless they really have an even grade on all of the top 3 on their board, in which case they might take Barkley at 1 like you suggest. But if you think they value Barkley highly enough to take at 1 overall, why do you then also think they would take Chubb over him if he's available at 4?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #485  
Old 04-19-2018, 01:32 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 7,928
Thanks: 1,780
Thanked 2,852 Times in 1,401 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
What does what I want or would hypothetically want have to do with it? Cleveland NEEDS a QB and will take one at 1 unless they really have an even grade on all of the top 3 on their board, in which case they might take Barkley at 1 like you suggest. But if you think they value Barkley highly enough to take at 1 overall, why do you then also think they would take Chubb over him if he's available at 4?

I am saying you have tunnel vision and are set on Chubb no matter what.
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
  #486  
Old 04-19-2018, 01:35 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 7,928
Thanks: 1,780
Thanked 2,852 Times in 1,401 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
Puck are you seriously saying Cleveland won't pick a QB with either of their picks?
Depends.... they could do a serious upgrade with Barkley and Chubb Ride out the QB for another yr or go with Taylor. Taylor is not a bad QB.

They will probably take a QB but you never know.... Do you think any of these QB's are sure fire superstars? Will all of them be better than Taylor?
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
  #487  
Old 04-19-2018, 01:59 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5,995
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,595 Times in 925 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
I am saying you have tunnel vision and are set on Chubb no matter what.
Which you have to know is bullshit, because I'm not advocating trading back up for him.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #488  
Old 04-19-2018, 02:12 PM
jchestnut31 jchestnut31 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Heard at lunch on Cowherd (who I can't stand) rumor is NYG will only take QB if Darnold is there. NYJ are locked in on Mayfield at 3 (with the assumption Darnold & Allen are gone).
Reply With Quote
  #489  
Old 04-19-2018, 02:13 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
Depends.... they could do a serious upgrade with Barkley and Chubb Ride out the QB for another yr or go with Taylor. Taylor is not a bad QB.

They will probably take a QB but you never know.... Do you think any of these QB's are sure fire superstars? Will all of them be better than Taylor?
That's not reasonable at all. The Browns are taking a QB.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FatDT For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (04-19-2018)
  #490  
Old 04-19-2018, 02:53 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jchestnut31 View Post
Heard at lunch on Cowherd (who I can't stand) rumor is NYG will only take QB if Darnold is there. NYJ are locked in on Mayfield at 3 (with the assumption Darnold & Allen are gone).
I’ve heard the same from a few other places, but it all still seems highly speculative.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.